• Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If your oath against genocide has any exceptions, it’s not an oath against genocide.

    So long as one person is in danger from genocide, we all are in danger from genocide.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m surprised employees are on-board with doing the work to block those emails. I suppose HR could easily implement that as well. Still a shitty thing to do.

  • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Devil’s Advocate… I mean… they don’t work for like a newspaper or a government agency.

    Unless there are those who need certain words for their jobs, I can kinda understand why Microsoft wouldn’t want emails from work addresses to go out with political agendas… for either side.

    Work emails should just be about work. Too many people use their work emails like a personal email… with their banking, shopping, etc. That’s what personal email addresses are for.

    This policy should go for many non-work related topics too. IT can unblock the words for certain users who need to use them for their job.

    • Jestzer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      This has nothing to do with preventing people from talking about non-work topics and is entirely about silencing people who protest the ethically questionable (at best) actions the company makes in relation to said country. Not only that, but they involved themselves in politics by selling to organizations that are entirely involved with politics.

      Edit: I would love to hear your rebuttal, rather than just downvoting everybody who has replied to you with no written response. It sounds like you have none otherwise.

      • nova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve found that people playing “devil’s advocate” tend not to argue in good faith. They want to be contrary and appear smart, not be challenged.

    • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Nah, because they aren’t blocking words on the other side, this is clearly targeting one specific thing they don’t like.

    • NGram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Being against your work supporting genocide seems pretty work-related to me. At best, it’ll just destroy their company culture (not that I’m convinced it’s good to start with). Optimistically, I hope everyone who’s hard to replace quits and finds a better job somewhere that cares about more than infinite financial growth.

    • Mike@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Nobody is using their email for personal stuff. And Microsoft is actively working with the Israeli government, so it’s not like protests against it are unwarranted.

    • x1gma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Unless there are those who need certain words for their jobs, I can kinda understand why Microsoft wouldn’t want emails from work addresses to go out with political agendas… for either side.

      Sure. Then block both sides, and not only the one not bringing you money.

      Work emails should just be about work. Too many people use their work emails like a personal email… with their banking, shopping, etc. That’s what personal email addresses are for.

      No one uses their company email for their personal banking, simply for the reason because if you’d leave, you’d lose your access, and since most companies run behind firewalls, vpns, 2fa tokens and similar additional credentials, it’s simply harder to use.

      This policy should go for many non-work related topics too. IT can unblock the words for certain users who need to use them for their job.

      Of course, let’s waste resources to maintain idiotic blocklists that are out of date the moment they are rolled out, and additional resources to make the blocklist actually work. Palestine, p4lestine, pale s tine, p a l e s t i n e, paleztine. Need more?

      You’re not at work for someone with this kind of unhinged mentality watching you working for 8 hours a day straight with no breaks and no distractions. You’re there to get your work done. In my current team, we’ve had the best ideas talking about our problems at the coffee machine. I personally focus best when I have music on. We’re doing sports together once a week on a company fitness incentive, which boosted our team dynamic massively. None of this would be possible in such a controlled environment.

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        People do use their work email for banking. Trust me. Some older people’s first email account was their work email… and they use it for everything.

        And yes, we had to get them to switch all their accounts over to a personal address once they left the company.

    • vzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Personal email? I haven’t gotten a personal message over email in almost a decade.

    • nao@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      “Emailing large numbers of employees about any topic not related to work is not appropriate. We have an established forum for employees who have opted in to political issues,” says Microsoft spokesperson Frank Shaw in a statement to The Verge. “Over the past couple of days, a number of politically focused emails have been sent to tens of thousands of employees across the company and we have taken measures to try and reduce those emails to those that have not opted in.”

      Work email is a tool provided by the company to be used for work topics. Some employees are apparently using this tool to send unrelated emails to people who didn’t sign up for it, but still have to deal with it somehow because they are probably required to check their email.

      The company trying to reduce this seems reasonable to me, I’m surprised that so many people seem to take offense at it.

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Then let’s see Microsoft do this with full transparency and keep a publicly accessible list of forbidden words. Then evidence this is a general policy should be plain.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Because the company being complicit in serious crimes against humanity and war crimes is a work related issue. You know like your boss demanding you to be an accomplice in a crime is a work related issue and most likely you have signed somewhere that you would report any suspected criminal activity to HR or your higher ups. Problem is if these are part of the crime too.

        If we lived in a world where there would be a rule of law thousands of Microsoft Employees would face life imprisonment for being accomplices to serious crimes.

        Calling this out is definitely work related.