Yeah - there must be some calculation done to estimate inefficiency.

I am looking at the numbers. Your graphic says the same thing the article does. That’s why I was asking for clarification

How does this address the swing with a single datapoint?

My point is people are likely choosing the Raw article because of the baity title. Their goals are not your goals.

Pretty sure this is intentional due to the community’s rule about maintaining the article’s title and only altering for clairity

It’s funny how we’ve heard the GOP whine about ‘activist judges’ for decades and it turned out it was just projection all along…

I think it’s pretty plain to you and I, but I doubt the folks at your local GOP meeting are going to hear it that way.

I think using the actual words could help.

Just more foreign election interference.

In case anyone isn’t getting it he’s calling for racial cleansing.

… like ‘emails’? Do your ‘emails’ have ‘datas’[sic] in them?

You mean ‘datums’?

I think they’re Obstruct and Project

I’m honestly not sure if sainthood is the way I’d put it. It feels negligent to me. But in fairness I’d love to hear the mods perspective on what they consider the threshold for trolling. It almost feels like it’s a secondary offense here. Like they won’t ban you for trolling, it’s got to be trolling aaaand [pejoratives|hate speech|etc].

Awww…temporary? Why?

Obviously it is political; can’t really dispute that. I did check the rules before posting (mostly because I wasn’t sure if links were allowed) but there was no mention of no politics ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Y’all really don’t think about shit in the shower that happened outside of the shower?

I can’t be the weird one here.

You can tell Elon is a genius because he gets people to pay to do prototype testing for him.

It highkey kinda sucks tho, being implicitly all like “I I can’thave Apollo do Reddit than nobody can have it!”. Its really childish and selfish in the way it fucks over almthe people who grew dependant on it for their Reddit-type social fix app

Maybe I’ve missed something but as far as I’m aware he hasn’t done anything to try and stop Voyager; he just didn’t give it a seal of approval.

As a practical matter, I wouldn’t invest any time or money into the guy’s projects anymore not because he doesn’t do amazing UI/UX/App work, but because he is not someone is seems to plan long-term or is advised by anyone who could have told him this would be a problem legally or administratively etc.

I think he absolutely does plan ahead. The fact that he was able to absorb the expense of all the refunds he was forced to issue for subscriptions that extended beyond his ability to access the API speaks directly to that.

Not to mention his foresight in being able to bring receipts when Spez and the other Reddit admins attempted to smear him in the press.

I think you feel more strongly about it than I do, so I’m not trying to change your mind or anything. I’m just adding my perspective.

I know; I understand where he was coming from and kinda get it, but I’m not going to stop using it.

Oh Christian…when will you learn you’re not big enough to disrupt existing power structures?

You’re an Aaron Swartz; not a Sam Altman…

(P.S. Love what you do; Posted from Voyager née Apollo)