There’s a huge difference between an article being mass downvoted by salty users who don’t want to face an unpleasant truth and an article being removed by salty moderators who won’t let their users even be passingly exposed to that truth. I’ve experienced that first one on .world but I haven’t ever had a problem with the second yet.
I can see the difference, but both still make people never question their thought bubble and echo chambers.
I just find it funny (for lack of a better term) that .world says its better, but just banned one of my favorite users for using citations aginast a moderator.
There’s a huge difference between an article being mass downvoted by salty users who don’t want to face an unpleasant truth and an article being removed by salty moderators who won’t let their users even be passingly exposed to that truth. I’ve experienced that first one on .world but I haven’t ever had a problem with the second yet.
I can see the difference, but both still make people never question their thought bubble and echo chambers.
I just find it funny (for lack of a better term) that .world says its better, but just banned one of my favorite users for using citations aginast a moderator.