vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agoFBI arrests judge in escalation of Trump immigration enforcement effortwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square183fedilinkarrow-up1856arrow-down16
arrow-up1850arrow-down1external-linkFBI arrests judge in escalation of Trump immigration enforcement effortwww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square183fedilink
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·7 hours agoI’ll wait till I see the supreme court weigh in. I don’t think you’re wrong but that’s where we are at.
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·7 hours agoIf you don’t think I’m wrong, why are you defending ICE here?
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 hours agoI’m not. I’m trying to be measured and not let the GOP control the news cycle.
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoYour entire argument has been “lets not get angry, maybe ICE is allowed to do this”. That’s not being measured, that’s defending ICE.
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 hours agoOk, who is fighting ICE in the courts?
minus-squarefaythofdragons@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 hours agoHere’s a similar case from last year, if you’re asking for court precedents. ICE was arresting people using an administrative warrant and not an arrest warrant, and it was ruled unconstitutional. https://www.aclusocal.org/en/press-releases/court-rules-against-ice-knock-and-arrests
minus-squareClinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 hours agoThank you for the info The order clarifies that while the “knock-and-talk” practice, as defined by the U.S. Supreme Court, is considered constitutional… We will get past this. If we are smart we cannot be fooled by the trump propaganda machine. I believe in us.
I’ll wait till I see the supreme court weigh in. I don’t think you’re wrong but that’s where we are at.
If you don’t think I’m wrong, why are you defending ICE here?
I’m not. I’m trying to be measured and not let the GOP control the news cycle.
Your entire argument has been “lets not get angry, maybe ICE is allowed to do this”. That’s not being measured, that’s defending ICE.
Ok, who is fighting ICE in the courts?
Here’s a similar case from last year, if you’re asking for court precedents. ICE was arresting people using an administrative warrant and not an arrest warrant, and it was ruled unconstitutional.
https://www.aclusocal.org/en/press-releases/court-rules-against-ice-knock-and-arrests
Thank you for the info
We will get past this. If we are smart we cannot be fooled by the trump propaganda machine.
I believe in us.