• chaogomu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        If a guy takes your car at gunpoint, and then hands you a fiver, he did not just “buy your car”.

        A peace treaty at the end of a war of conquest is not a “purchase agreement”.

        • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          You are assuming a lot, especially that Mexico had a functional government even before their Army slaughters settlers in Texas.

          • chaogomu@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Moving the goal posts now?

            It was okay to launch a war of conquest because the Mexican government was weak?

            All because a bunch of American slave owners invaded Texas and started a war of “independence”.

            But there’s more to the story. Mostly Santa Anna. He became a national hero for beating back attempts at conquest by both Spain and France. He became president and then sparked a multi-front civil war by centralizing power in his own hands…

            But yes, he also killed some slavers. Boo hoo.

            • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              11 months ago

              Nope, just saying your missing A LOT historically. What doesn’t change is that the west was purchased for $10 million.

              • chaogomu@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 months ago

                A bit rich, considering you refuse to acknowledge the simple fact that the Mexican-American war was one of open conquest.

                The entire justification for the war was Mexico refusing to sell the land that the US wanted, so James K. Polk sent 80 soldiers into Mexican territory, then launched a war when Mexico easily overwhelmed them.

                The war went badly for Mexico, because it was still recovering from a civil war, the Texas revolution, multiple invasions attempts by Spain and France, and their own war of independence against Spain.

                The US actually took Mexico City, but decided not to just take the entire country because they didn’t want to get into a long, drawn out occupation that would have sapped resources and manpower.

                The Spanish had learned that Mexico is impossible to hold through force. A lesson the French would learn under Napoleón III.

                The US at the time was smart enough to not even try.

                • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  The United States never wanted Mexico. Thus it bought the parts of Mexico that it’s citizens were already moving to. It could have just taken it through conquest but it didn’t.