No, it’s because no 3rd party is able to gain even the slightest interest among the wider electorate. They are called “fringe” candidates for a reason.
Perot in '92 was the most successful, didn’t even hit 20% and won 0 states.
So, again, your choices are one candidate who admits to wanting to burn everything down, and one who doesn’t.
No, it’s because no 3rd party is able to gain even the slightest interest among the wider electorate. They are called “fringe” candidates for a reason.
Perot in '92 was the most successful, didn’t even hit 20% and won 0 states.
So, again, your choices are one candidate who admits to wanting to burn everything down, and one who doesn’t.
The choice is easy.