This came up in my health care forum.

Right now, you can legally detain someone medically when they are a danger to themselves or others for up to 72hrs. The details vary by state, but this is how we lock down individuals trying to suicide or someone mentally off the rails making threats of violence.

This variation on that law would also make opposition to Trump qualify.

Civil commitment can follow as with individuals who have profound mental illness and are not safe to be out in the world.

This is the loudest scream that democracy is dead short of hauling people out into the street and shooting them.

It’s important to note the police are currently the people who bring individuals in for the 72hr mental health holds.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This is the litmus test for our democracy. If it passes we are so unbelievably fucking cooked.

    • ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      We’ve been hurtling past brightline after brightline for decades. Now it is so flagrantly obvious, can it get any more obvious than multiple Goose-step Salutes, but more importantly the propaganda spin to play them off and justify it as not being a disqualifying action. They used to have to dog whistle their zeal for bigotry and xenophobia.

      The question is, what the actual fuck are we going to do about it?

      Organize? Direct action? That magic word that happens when you mash up insurance and male arousal? The DNC would not support or pardon folks involved in that effort, and the corporate media would absolutely vilify it.

      The answer is obvious, with historical underpinning, although we still have to figure out how to “televise the revolution” in this day and age.