• galloog1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hamas is literally in this video firing missiles. The people on this site including yourself have your heads in the sand.

      • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        When someone says “Being a governing leader is really hard” they don’t talk about parties or meetings, they talk about these decisions.

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Lines of logic where you don’t stop prematurely when you get your answer and instead follow through.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Hamas is literally in this video firing missiles.

      Yes they are. So kill them then without leveling the entire neighborhood, as I already said.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Go for it. If it is so easy you are welcome to go put yourself in harm’s way. Don’t criticize when you have not been faced with the decisions and a lack of full awareness. Hamas is not sitting out in the middle of a field waiting to be struck.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It is neither my place, nor my responsibility to physically take part in this conflict. However, it certainly IS my place and responsibility, as a human being, to say that purposefully killing innocent civilians and blowing up functional hospitals is evil. Yes, even when there is a bad guy hiding inside.

            • dangblingus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So, in your mind, rules of engagement allow destroying civilian infrastructure that currently hosts many civilians so you can kill a handful of bad guys?

              • Hatsune Miku @lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Article 19 of Geneva states that if a hospital is being used to store military equipment and active military combatants, then it loses its protection.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            However, it certainly IS my place and responsibility, as a human being, to say that purposefully killing innocent civilians and blowing up functional hospitals is evil

            It’s your responsibility to actually know what is happening before you spout false things online.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay genius, how do you kill them when they are in tunnels under neighborhoods? You cannot get into them without an explosion, even if present in person and they won’t just sit there either. This is not a war crime and I’m really questioning everyone’s collective intelligence and ability to think through problems instead of reacting to stimulus.

          • SCB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is literally true.

            Specific protection of medical establishments and units (including hospitals) is the general rule under IHL. Therefore, specific protection to which hospitals are entitled shall not cease unless they are used by a party to the conflict to commit, outside their humanitarian functions, an “act harmful to the enemy”. In case of doubt as to whether medical units of establishments are used to commit an “act harmful to the enemy”, they should be presumed not to be so used.

            Emphasis mine.

            • Natanael@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Proportionality is another factor you’re ignoring.

              They’re also still required to attempt to limit targeting to avoid civilian casualties and yet they don’t

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                They do limit targeting. How many strikes are you seeing in the south as compared to the north? That’s a limitation and shows proportionality. You folks may not like it but this is categorically not a war crime.

                  • galloog1@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Correct which is why your entire narrative is false because they never told civilians to go to a specific place. Dig into it. This is exactly what I mean when I call this stuff propaganda. It’s stretching the truth and inviting you to draw your own conclusions from warped facts.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You don’t have to shoot missiles indiscriminately into civilian zones. If your enemy is hiding among civilian infrastructure and/or using human shields, you need to change your tactics up to suit. Committing war crimes in order to kill your enemy isn’t how you retain the moral highground.

          • galloog1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m still waiting on these tactics you are recommending. Alternatives don’t exist so your argument is absolute bullshit. The faster they can get through this, the less overall civilian suffering will occur.

              • galloog1@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                What war crimes? There is a difference between war and war crimes and hardly anybody on this site knows the difference.

                • crapwittyname@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago
                  • bombing civilian infrastructure which is likely to have families, children, non combatants inside is a war crime.
                  • collective punishment is a war crime.
                  • forcible relocation is a war crime.
                  • ordering civilians to a new area and then bombing them en route or on arrival is intentional targeting of civilians, and therefore a war crime.
                  • blockading a population within an area which you are actively shelling is a war crime.
                  • depriving a population of non combatants of food and water and fuel is a war crime.
                  • bombing a convoy of ambulances is a war crime.
                  • bombing a refugee camp is a war crime.
                  • killing reporters is a war crime.
                  • use of white phosphorus on civilian targets is a war crime.

                  Israel has done all of these things. There is no excuse for war crimes. It doesn’t matter how evil the enemy is, you are not allowed to do these things and not be a war criminal.

                  • galloog1@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Civilian infrastructure are public works dedicated solely to civilians and does not inherently include power. You do not understand war crimes.

                    Collective punishment implies no military purpose. Israel is being very careful to include military purpose in all their narratives. You do not understand war crimes.

                    Forcible relocation is only occurring if Israel does not allow them to return after the current conflict is concluded. This is not relevant right now and is actively warned against. You do not understand war crimes.

                    Israel has not ordered civilians to any specific area they have then bombed. There’s a lot of disinformation around this one in terms of hitting former routes well after they should’ve been gone. You don’t understand the information space.

                    Israel has a border. That’s not blockading a population in anymore than Egypt is guilty of the exact same thing within context. You don’t understand war crimes.

                    Not providing food is not the same thing as depriving of food and it’s been shown to go to Hamas, not the civilian population when they do. You don’t understand the information space or war crimes. This does however show why they want to end the conflict as quickly as possible. It clouds decision making.

                    Bombing a convoy of mismarked vehicles is not a war crime. Just because you through a red crescent on your logistics vehicles and then use them to transport combatants does not make it an illegitimate target. Hamas does this because it works. The IDF has shown at least some of their intelligence supporting this. https://www.idf.il/en/mini-sites/hamas-israel-war-articles-videos-and-more/war-on-hamas-2023-resources/hamas-terrorist-uses-ambulances-for-transportation-purposes/ You don’t understand war crimes.

                    Something called a refugee camp for 80 years is not an active refugee camp. You don’t understand the information space

                    Intentionally targeting reporters is a war crime. I’m yet to see anything close to intent but it is sad that reporters have been caught up and killed regardless. They are actively trying to gain more information from Gaza which does put them more at risk.

                    The IDF is not using white phosphorous munitions within Gaza City but have probably used it for illumination. This is perfectly legal. You don’t understand the information space.

                    If any of these statements are inaccurate, feel free to provide a source that has actual evidence. War crimes happen in literally every army so don’t think I don’t think they happen. The difference is when it is planned, condoned, and unprosecuted by the supporting organization. That is my burden of proof. I have seen the Hamas operations order. The IDF have so far not been acting out of accordance with what’s expected of a modern professional fighting force.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  This site?

                  The perfectly homogenous lemmy?

                  I’m talking about intentionally targeting civilian population which is a defined war crime.

                  How do you figure it is not?

                  • galloog1@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Good luck providing proof of intent. That should be a red flag right there about your narrative. Israel’s narrative has never been that they are targeting civilians and they’ve shown on quite a few occasions in this current conflict that they have justification for their targets. They are at war right now. They don’t have time to justify every single target to you personally.

    • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I checked the Arabic news scene for “AI” and whatever they call Israel thanks to Google AI and Yandex translate. They label every single “negative” photo,video,audio AI as things created by Israel. Their heads aren’t in the sand, they are indoctrinated which makes the situation truly horrible. There were teenagers getting medals in Hitler’s last days. As a side-note I guess they are trying to bury your opinion like they do in the evil site not knowing this place was founded by FOSS ideals which they don’t have a clue about.

      • galloog1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think there are media controls on Lemmy but it also opens it up to automated propaganda and manipulation.

        • Ilgaz@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess they try to “punish” user by downvoting whatever thing they don’t like.