• ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    How come ole Joe didn’t pardon all the democrats in America if we wanted to save people from the wrath of Trump? He had the constitutional power to do it after all…

    • 474D@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      He’s been clear that he never wanted to drop out of the race, he probably isn’t too happy with Democrats either

      • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who says a specific group of people can’t be, “All Americans?” There’s nothing in the Constitution that provides limits on the pardon power. In theory, if they wanted to, a president could issue a pardon for every American for every violation of federal law ever committed.

          • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Of course there could be rulings on anything. But you’re inventing the “specificity” argument from whole cloth. Historically, there has never been any ruling establishing such limits on presidential pardons. And it’s not even on the radar of potential rulings circulating in right-wing circles. There are a lot of dubious legal theories that right wingers have proposed, such as creative interpretations to get around birthright citizenship. But there aren’t conservative legal scholars out there arguing that the pardoning power should be redefined.

            The court could also just straight-up rule various demographic groups to be illegal and worthy of imprisonment without trial. There’s really no point on worrying about purely hypothetical rulings that have no evidence that they are even being considered.

            The is an invention entirely of your own creation.