• PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      A CEO is a position, not a person. Killing him isn’t any sort of defense when he isn’t actively endangering others.

      It’s murder, even if it’s justified. Stop these idiotic word games. They only weaken your position.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        He is mass murderer. Would you clutch pearls if someone assassinated a warlord?

        • timestatic@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          He (the warlord) would still be murdered. Just with a justification - So it is really only a word game

          Self defense only applies when you literally defend yourself from an attack in that moment. If you get away from a warlord with your life and kill him a day later thats again murder.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Pointing out your wanton violation of language isn’t pearl clutching.

          If your use of the word warlord is equivocated to all hell like your other vocab choices our warlord might be a janitor or some shit, so it’s hard to say.

          Edit: also, merry christmas. I hope the holiday season has been well :)