All I’ve been able to find are cherry picked words and sentences the police tell the press in both’s attempts to spin it for their narratives.

Is it foolish to hope the public will get to read it in its relative entirety (a word or a name redacted is understandable, not entire paragraphs) in less than years or decades?

Legal process is a blindspot for me, I don’t know what they’re able to have as evidence that they can also keep from the public eye if they wish.

  • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    That it could be an incitement to violence is precisely what they will/have argue(d), I would guess.