• Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using the official app on GrapheneOS on a Pixel a for over two years, havent had any issues and everything is very responsive.

    What model phone do you have?

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I also use this phone and doesn’t seem to have any issue, and I have over 700 entires in my bitwarden vault. My main browser is firefox though. If the issue is bitwarden is slow to unlock the vault, this is normal if your vault has high KDF iterations. Also, if you’re using the stock os, mi ui is very aggressive at killing background tasks, which means bitwarden will need to be relaunched over and over again and have to unlock the vault again every time, which further increase the perception of slowness.

      • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has problems on the stock MIUI ROM. I have the same phone, I have experienced it. The autofill feature used to turn off automatically.

        I installed the official LineageOS, some time ago. Now, it works great, no problems at all.

    • Albin Jose@suppo.fiOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its so slow and lagging. Even its opensource , i feels it is a very heavy app.

      • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How many KDF iterations did you set your vault to? I have mine at 600,000 so it definitely takes a moment (~3 sec) to decrypt on older devices.

        The decryption being compute heavy is by design. You only need to decrypt once to unlock your vault, but someone brute forcing it would need to decrypt a billion+ times. Increasing compute needed for decryption makes it more expensive to brute force your master password.

        In fact, LastPass made the mistake of setting their default iteration count to 1000 before they got breached and got a ton of flak for it.

          • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It doesn’t matter how many passwords you are storing inside. It’s the number of cycles of decryption needed to be performed in order to unlock the vault. More cycles = more time.

            You can have an empty vault and it will still be slow to decrypt with a high kdf iteration count/expensive algorithm.

            You can think of it as an old fashioned safe with a hand crank. You put in the key and turn the crank. It doesn’t matter if the safe is empty or not, as long as you need to turn the crank 1000 times to open it it WILL be slower than a safe that only needs 10 turns. Especially so if you have a 10 year old (less powerful device) turning the crank.

            • As someone with quite a few passwords in Bitwarden, I think the amount of passwords very much matters. The search UI seems to try to stuff all entries into a flat list (even though I have folders) and that’s adding lag and slowdown after I’ve already waited for decryption to take place.

              It’s not annoying enough for me to look for a fix, but if you add more than a couple hundred passwords, the amount of entries starts to matter.

              • StarDreamer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hmm… I need to test this out then. I have about 200+ entries across multiple folders, but I’m not seeing much of a slowdown. But then again most of my hardware is pretty good (except for one or two devices).

          • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seems like it’s a you/your specific phone problem. Everyone else says it runs well. I have like 130 saved entries on mine and no lag.

  • Remy Rose@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    really? that’s where i mostly use it, and to me it seems to work great! but on the other hand, i haven’t really experienced it anywhere else

  • soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really, bitwarden is poorly optimized everywhere. They cut corners at every expense using cross-platform frameworks, specifically web technologies on desktop and Xamarin on mobile. I’m hoping that someday someone writes a better client. But at least the main client has autofill down pretty well, it just becomes a pain when you want to actually do some advanced editing

    • Xamarin on mobile, at least on Android, isn’t necessarily slow by any margin. The command line interface being a Javascript program is almost comically bad (and slow as well), but the Android app would be about this speed whether it used Java or dotnet.

      The Electron stuff is rather annoying, but it makes sense since the extension has to run from an addon popup anyway. They could do some weird WASM tricks to share code with a native implementation, but that sounds like a pain to do proper security analysis on.

      I’m with you, waiting for better frontends. On the other hand, I’m also eagerly awaiting passkey support. If someone were to create the Vaultwarden of frontends, perhaps Bitwarden would put more effort into improving their client performance.

  • Meho_Nohome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I had so many issues with Bitwarden on Android that I couldn’t use it. I’m using KeepassDX. It works well on Android, is FOSS, and isn’t cloud based.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a Pixel 7 Pro. It loads fast enough for me (~3s) considering I have 800+ entries and using argon2id with 20 KDF iterations, 256MB of memory and 8 parallelism.

  • 𝑔𝑎𝑙𝑎𝑥𝑖@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I haven’t used it outside of Windows Firefox and Android but it works great for me as well.

    For mobile specifically: Rarely do I have any issues, and when I do, I have a quick panel button for Bitwarden (top drag down menu) that lets me manually trigger it. I can’t think of any apps that it doesn’t work with. My one nit is that autofill credit card info doesn’t work often, but obv that’s a secondary use, and the info is still with me if I ever need it on the go. And adding new login info can be a little tedious on mobile – much easier to create it first, then autofill. Highly appreciate the 2FA feature too. The auto copy feature feels really seamless regardless of if I’m on my phone or not.

    I’d be curious what issues you seem to be running into with it.

    • codenamekino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I fit into about the same categories of use as you do, and I agree with most of your assessments. My one complaint is that, when I go to enter my master password the keyboard no longer pops up automatically, instead requiring that I tap the password field to bring it up. That stated happening sometime last year, and I’ve lived with it, but it’s just a quality of life thing that I miss.

  • macisr@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t had any troubles, but on the phone I use it just to insert the passwords. For everything else I use it on pc.

  • gabriele97@lemmy.g97.top
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The recent update broke everything (it automatically locks on app exit both on Android and iOS, even if the automatic lock is set to never)

  • asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No? I’ve been using it for years now and had no issues with the app. The app has a old UI though, I am surs I’ve seen on their roadmap that they were planning to revamp it someday. But the works.