You have a history you seem proud of where you are unwilling to comprehend consequences.
Thanks for being interested enough in me to worry about my “history.” I don’t have to prove anything to you. I disagree with you. You disagree with me. And that’s ok.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
‘Interested’ is not the word I would use. We’ve had a couple conversations (I’m not fooled by the name change) where you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view and follow up with nonsense copypasta as if that somehow absolves you of any obligation to improve.
The issue isn’t the news organization. It’s you refusing to concede she parrots Russian rhetoric and takes their side with the Ukraine conflict despite conceding it is an illegal war. Her tap dancing around it to not openly admit she is Putin’s plant is your ONLY response. You do not provide any rebuttal other than “I am not convinced”. “Reach out to the news organization”? Are they going to find where you live, bury you in a pile of Stein quotes of her spouting russian talking points while playing a video of RT broadcasting the same thing until you finally admit “OMG EVIDENCE MATTERS”? No? Then why bother?
So spare me your BS copypasta deflecting any responsibility and actually contribute something of value to the conversation. Can you find a contradictory quote from Stein where she declares the ‘peace plan’ she intends for Ukraine listed in her platform commits to pre-2014 Ukraine borders? If you can’t, then admit she is anti-Ukraine/pro-Russian and stop defending her with vapour.
What do you mean? The name change isn’t for “fooling” anyone. When I update my “display name” the names get updated to all my past posts. So there is not “fooling” anyone.
And I have the same username, I haven’t changed my username, so not sure what you mean by not being fooled by a name change. My entire post and comment history is public.
you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view
OR maybe I just haven’t changed my mind or my opinion.
You haven’t changed your opinion about voting for harris. Does that mean you “you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view”?
Her tap dancing around it to not openly admit she is Putin’s plant
Exactly. She’s never said it. I don’t belive she is. Let it go. You have your opinion, I have mine. I respect your opinion. Respect mine.
You do not provide any rebuttal other than “I am not convinced”.
I am under no obligation to provide any rebuttal or prove anything to you. I gave you my opinion. Accept it or not. Not my problem.
Also, I’m not even voting for Jill Stein, so calm down.
It does not matter who you claim you are or are not voting for. You defend her. With nothing but blind stubbornness. Still haven’t rebutted the fact she has pro-Russian stances. Just more head in the sand.
I don’t have to prove anything to you. I told you my opinion. You can accept or not. I don’t care.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators–they have removed articles that don’t fit in the community. Thank you!
Thanks for being interested enough in me to worry about my “history.” I don’t have to prove anything to you. I disagree with you. You disagree with me. And that’s ok.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators. Thank you!
‘Interested’ is not the word I would use. We’ve had a couple conversations (I’m not fooled by the name change) where you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view and follow up with nonsense copypasta as if that somehow absolves you of any obligation to improve.
The issue isn’t the news organization. It’s you refusing to concede she parrots Russian rhetoric and takes their side with the Ukraine conflict despite conceding it is an illegal war. Her tap dancing around it to not openly admit she is Putin’s plant is your ONLY response. You do not provide any rebuttal other than “I am not convinced”. “Reach out to the news organization”? Are they going to find where you live, bury you in a pile of Stein quotes of her spouting russian talking points while playing a video of RT broadcasting the same thing until you finally admit “OMG EVIDENCE MATTERS”? No? Then why bother?
So spare me your BS copypasta deflecting any responsibility and actually contribute something of value to the conversation. Can you find a contradictory quote from Stein where she declares the ‘peace plan’ she intends for Ukraine listed in her platform commits to pre-2014 Ukraine borders? If you can’t, then admit she is anti-Ukraine/pro-Russian and stop defending her with vapour.
What do you mean? The name change isn’t for “fooling” anyone. When I update my “display name” the names get updated to all my past posts. So there is not “fooling” anyone.
And I have the same username, I haven’t changed my username, so not sure what you mean by not being fooled by a name change. My entire post and comment history is public.
OR maybe I just haven’t changed my mind or my opinion.
You haven’t changed your opinion about voting for harris. Does that mean you “you systematically refuse to integrate information that contradicts your world view”?
Exactly. She’s never said it. I don’t belive she is. Let it go. You have your opinion, I have mine. I respect your opinion. Respect mine.
I am under no obligation to provide any rebuttal or prove anything to you. I gave you my opinion. Accept it or not. Not my problem.
Also, I’m not even voting for Jill Stein, so calm down.
It does not matter who you claim you are or are not voting for. You defend her. With nothing but blind stubbornness. Still haven’t rebutted the fact she has pro-Russian stances. Just more head in the sand.
I don’t have to prove anything to you. I told you my opinion. You can accept or not. I don’t care.
If you believe any part of the article is inaccurate, I encourage you to reach out to the news organization that published it. If you think the article doesn’t align with the community guidelines, feel free to contact the moderators–they have removed articles that don’t fit in the community. Thank you!