• breadsmasher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes, voting for a candidate who is almost guaranteed to not get elected, and end up with the party less likely to want to fix it.

    good plan! good luck 👍

    • Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldBannedOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes, voting for a candidate who is almost guaranteed to not get elected,

      So should we ONLY vote one we think is going to win then?

      How about we vote for who we WANT to win. And I want Jill Stein to win. I don’t look at the odds, I look at the platform and the policies.

      • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        You are entirely missing the point. That’s ok. In the grand scheme of things, whats one single vote, right?

          • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            So why vote at all? 🤷‍♀️

            You absolutely should vote. But, you aren’t getting the point.

            No one is “upset”. Just a conversation. Are you upset?