• Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Kinda burying the lede on that complaint…

    and 321 edits on the ridiculously detailed International recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Both of these articles were, at one time, strongly biased in favor of Russia.

    Wikipedia cares more about bias than* ridiculous details, especially when the ridiculous detail is there to put bias into the article

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        What is the difference between including ridiculous amounts of detail to bias the article, and superfluous biased details that still end up with a biased article?

        Seems like a distinction without a difference.