

There’s nothing wrong with writing code manually. Over the past few months LLMs have gotten a lot better at writing code than they were before, but they can still make weird mistakes.
Any pronouns. 33.
Professional developer and amateur gardener located near Atlanta, GA in the USA.
I’m using a new phone keyboard, please forgive typos.


There’s nothing wrong with writing code manually. Over the past few months LLMs have gotten a lot better at writing code than they were before, but they can still make weird mistakes.


What you’re calling AI has somewhat shifted to being called AGI. Either way, the ship has long since set sail and LLMs are lumped under the category of AI. That’s what it’s called. Usage dictates meaning. It’s not an endorsement of the technology. The same way the computer AIs in games are called AI even if they aren’t “real AI.”


Maybe it’s just a coincidence! Maybe those files just randomly do that lmao. Including deleting themselves!
Lol, imagine if they made that defense. “This was the result of an AI hallucination!”


Yep, especially because chip manufacturing has such a massive barrier to enter.


Old device? Ooh, that’s suspicious.


And as we all know, they’re going to say that not using a Genuine™ Android® Operating System is extremely suspicious.


Don’t overthink the metaphor. These things are fragile and fall apart. The “door with a lock” is the “guarantee” (wink wink) that the operating system won’t let programs see memory they shouldn’t be allowed to. Putting your valuables in a safe instead of sitting in the floor would be encrypting the passwords in memory in the metaphor.
Also, cyber security and physical security are very different. With cyber security you need to understand that there are orders of magnitude more people looking for simple problems. Like a criminal checking every door in the world automatically, just looking for ones that are unlocked. Someone not being a “target for master criminals” isn’t really applicable for this. Besides, that’s a critique of what level of security an individual should have, but pointing out the flaw in Edge is a critique of something that claims to be secure that isn’t.


This is sort of like saying “I leave my valuables in plain sight by my door because it has a lock on it and door locks are trustworthy.” I’m not super into cyber security and stuff but it seems like one of the most common problems is programs managing to get access to memory they shouldn’t have access to. It seems to happen all the time! Just like many locks for you door are trash.


As trash as LinkedIn is, I’ve gotten three of my last four jobs through there and a ton of leads and offers. Yeah, I really couldn’t imagine getting banned. That freaks me out.


I think there’s a place for that, but it really shouldn’t be your only one.


The Scottish thing is a scam because they aren’t even legally allowed to sell souvenir plots of land. Like obviously nobody in their right mind thinks it makes you a Lord or Lady, but they don’t even sell you the land!!!


Depends on what they’re selling. If it’s not a necessity and more of a luxury then people will buy a lot less when prices rise a lot. They’re losing it because people are buying less of their products, not because the company is paying the tariff.


Misread the headline as removing instead of adding. Was very confused.


I swear I saw the word Cheeto in the headline, I guess the C- from criticize and -to from NATO tripped me up. What do you call Freudian slips of the eyes?
The post isn’t beating the allegations. Wanting to avoid political discussions is inherently political.
Be the content you want to see.
Also, it’s odd to equate deep subject matter with a lack of politics.


We’re too busy dying of preventable illnesses due to lack of free healthcare to die of embarrassment.


I could’ve sworn that I saw a headline recently that gcc isn’t deterministic. But maybe that was some really weird edge case or a bug.


I hear people complain about their countries all the time.
What was the context?