• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wow, why though? Why not just let the user change the batteries or charge them like normal electric toothbrushes?

      And why would you buy these instead of a normal re-usable one?

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I find the disposable ones are overall cheaper and the batteries last about as long as the brushes. Unless you are inclined to replace your head often as such people may be than they might be a better option.

        They are more like vibrating brushes and reality is quite simple in design. Less complex then the replaceable heads that have moving parts and seals etc. After using both, I find that work just as good and both are noticeably better than non electric brushes.

      • radix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my experience the toothbrush handle and motor and batteries are fine to keep for years. The disposable part is only the head, the physical cleaning bits.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well that’s not really disposable then, that’s just a normal electric toothbrush.

          You have to replace the cleaning bits, no toothbrush head is good to use for more than like 2-3 months.

          • radix@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right, I totally agree. Sorry I misunderstood. I don’t have a clue why people would want an electric toothbrush that is also manual and must be thrown away soon.

          • pqdinfo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There are two problems here:

            1. Most of the disposable toothbrushes don’t have the ability to replace the heads. Some of them do, as the GP mentioned, but most don’t in my experience.

            2. The ability to replace the heads is not the same thing as actually being able to find the heads in the store that sold you the toothbrush.

            3. The entire assembly costs typically something in the same ballpark as a head replacement anyway.

            4. The entire assembly often costs less to replace on a regular basis than the heads for, say, the Sonicare - $24 for 3 heads at the time of writing, compare this to the $10 two pack of disposable brushes, $8 per unit (plus the cost of the rest of the system) for the “right” way, $5 per unit for the disposable route (all inclusive.)

            Most of these disposable systems are cheap in every sense of the word (cost and build quality) and not really intended to be used for a long period of time.

            From a consumer standpoint, they make a lot of sense. From an environmental standpoint, not so much. How did we get here? Well, Sonicare would probably argue they make a superior brush and therefore can charge more which may or may not be true. More likely the volumes involved combined with the “Upscale”/“Downscale” marketing associated with each brush makes it genuinely much, much, cheaper to create an all-in-one unit that’s only supposed to last a month compared to the alternatives.