Pretty damning review.

  • cyberic@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their issues are:

    1. Bad data - major errors in review videos
    2. Ethical concerns - conflicts of interest, Billet review, Pwnage review
      • SilentStorms@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think that their point that it’s an $800 product for a last-gen card, there really isn’t anyone out there that should buy this, and therefore it’s a bad product is valid. They could have handled the whole thing better and honestly should’ve just scrapped the video before release.

        Auctioning off the prototype when the company asked for it back is pretty inexcusable. I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t malicious, but they clearly have problems with internal communication of things like this are happening.

        At any rate, it’s going to be a spicy WAN show this week. Linus needs to actually watch the video and address this point-by-point. If he “reads the comments” or cherry picks some of GN’s weaker arguments he’s just going to end up throwing fuel on the fire.

        • ghostinthessh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty normal for water blocks to come out well after a GPUs release. Also it looks like it was a new product/company so it makes sense the design took longer than the competition.

        • Wrench@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then they shouldn’t have reviewed it if their decision was made before even holding the product in their hand.

          They could have reviewed it from the point of view of an R&D curiosity with the potential future iterations and cost reductions as the new startup finds their feet. Because, you know, that’s what it was. But they decided to shit all over it for dishonest reasons instead.

        • nachom97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dont think it was malicious, but it is incredibly negligent. It puts a huge stain on the company that’s expected to honor embargos for unreleased products.

        • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel that if LMG looked at this product and thought “hey this is really dogshit”, the decent thing to do would have been to go back to billet and tell them we can’t cover it at all (and cop the loss of few hours as part of running an ethical business)

      • ElusiveClarity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand why he won’t just own up to the wrong gpu thing and move on. It’s like getting pissy that the f150 exhaust sounds like shit on your ford ranger.

      • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        If LMG gave out a prototype for their latest screwdriver to be reviewed and it was onsold, I highly doubt it being called a “mistake” would have sufficed, heads would be rolling

        Feel terrible for Billet and how they were treated here

        • legion02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ltt is certainly not innocent here but this one I’ll disagree with since it basically just happened to them with an early sample of the backpack.

        • Contend6248@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Billet was treated very bad here and i’m not trying to defend anyone, but i didn’t saw the video and only heard from them because of this shitshow

      • urshanabi [he/they]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is hard to believe, it seems too comical.

        I believe you of course, and without accumulating enough about Linus’ & LTT’s antics I would have doubted you. I wonder what it is that causes these kinds of things to happen. I want to say success but I think there may be something about their ethos. Not what they espouse but what they sorta believe internally.

    • kakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seemed like fair criticism to me, honestly. I enjoy watching LTT, but if they want to be a reliable source of data with “The Lab”, they can’t continue acting purely as an entertainment company.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, it was very measured and specific. You could tell he took no pleasure in doing it, the disappointment felt very genuine. It was also a classy move to avoid monetization

        I mean for sure he just got a ton of viewers, but it didn’t feel like YouTuber beef or a takedown.

        I think he hints at the real issue a few times when he calls them “the company”. It’s the issue why I haven’t been into Linus for a while - he talks like a capitalist now. He’s got plenty of technical opinions, but you can tell he’s not keeping up to speed on the tech (he’s always getting help from someone off screen) - instead, he’s always talking about business.

        He talks about making products, the challenges, plans to expand, the sometimes hard to watch reccounts of changing relationships with his friends turned staff.

        Which is still content, and I am led to believe he genuinely has a commitment to making good products and standing by them. But I’m not into that. I don’t find it interesting, and I find myself skeptical of his technical judgement and less able to identify with him