• oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    That’s funny because you would have to hunt for extra definitions to find something other than what the court ruled. This was a pretty cut and dry case.

    Regardless, to claim the constitution is meant to be read “in plain text” is laughable. And to presume you know more about the constitution than nine Supreme Court justices in agreement on this matter is just embarrassing for you.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well considering they hold 15th century English church law to be above the Constitution I’m not so sure about their law degrees.