Sky-Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days ago

GOP midterm prospects take dire turn after new ‘disaster’ unfolds in Trump’s war: analysts

www.rawstory.com

external-link
message-square
18
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • usa@lemmy.ml
171
external-link

GOP midterm prospects take dire turn after new ‘disaster’ unfolds in Trump’s war: analysts

www.rawstory.com

return2ozma@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 days ago
message-square
18
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • usa@lemmy.ml
A new “disaster” in the Middle East may further jeopardize Republicans’ electoral prospects in November, with the GOP already facing an uphill battle amid soaring prices, two analysts warned on Saturday.According to BBC, the Yemeni militant group known as the Houthis claimed to have carried out miss...
  • phar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    FYI the word is just “regardless.”

    • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Technically, sadly, irregardless is recognized as an actual word. Sure, with an asterisk, but still.

      The president of my company who always thought he was the sharpest MFer in the room always used it. It was only one of the reasons I disliked him, but it was definitely a reason.

      • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s one of those words, like “funnily”, that shouldn’t exist.

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Technically, no. But in practice yes. Unless you’re going to start in on ruining the word “technically” as well.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Technically, no.

          The major dictionaries all agree it is in fact a word. Just not the ideal choice.

          https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless

          https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/irregardless

          https://www.oed.com/search/dictionary/?q=irregardless&tl=true

          • SeptugenarianSenate@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            how I always took was that it’s like saying regardless and/or irregardless (regardless or not) with only one extra syllable instead of all 3, to be used as a changing-of-topics transition phrase.

            But I remember a few times when some people would use the “longer version” at times when it seemed like they really only needed/meant to be using the word regardless.

            FMP those people just liked saying the slightly longer word slightly more because it made them look/sound smarter.

            I don’t know if I hallucinated that whole definition part into existence though because my sample size for this type of memory of conversations is limited in both total frequency and relative importance in moments when people have ever been using the word regardless, vs irregardlesses, around me

            • BruisedMoose@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              regardless or not

              Look, it’s only 7:30 and I’m just finishing my first cup of coffee, but this is hurting my brain. I understand what you’re saying, I’m just trying to make it make sense in any context and can’t do it.

            • Logi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              FMP those people just liked saying the slightly longer word slightly more because it made them look/sound smarter.

              Little do they know. Literally and figuratively.

              Still not as bad as using “whom” wrong.

    • _chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I will carry on 😉

      https://www.npr.org/2020/07/07/887649010/regardless-of-what-you-think-irregardless-is-a-word

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.74K users / day
  • 5.39K users / week
  • 9.95K users / month
  • 22.3K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 31.2K subscribers
  • 34.5K Posts
  • 888K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
  • aidan@lemmy.world
  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
  • 🌱 🐄🌱 @lemmy.world
  • Theonetheycall1845@lemmy.world
  • JuBe@lemmy.world
  • Lasherz@lemmy.world
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org