No, you said someone else’s point was trying to be made and now you’re deflecting. I asked you first. You answer mine and then we can move on to yours.
That yours is not the only voice that matters. That other people are allowed to convey ideas and the world isnt just waiting with baited breath for you to bless us with yours.
I’d say it holds up even more. All sick people go to hospitals and that’s where we employs doctors. EFF’s target audience[1] are using Twitch so they go there.
1: I assume, since why would they use Twitch otherwise?
Yes, once again, that’s why this analogy does not make sense. The EFF is not running a hospital, they’re running a livestream, which can happen in any of a dozen different places simultaneously.
Well that website links to livestream.eff.org, and that page says the stream will be “simulcast”, i.e. mirrored, to Twitch and Youtube. So the main channel is indeed free.
Oh damn. I meant their website, but I didn’t notice they just embed a Twitch stream on their website, thought it was a self-hosted stream. Never mind me.
Promoting it with…a Twitch stream.
A doctor must go where the sick people are.
That ended in like, the 1700s. We have hospitals now.
Believe it or not, there are sick people in hospitals.
Yeah. That’s half the point of them!
A doctor cannot be in several places at once. That’s where your analogy falls apart.
It’s not an analogy, it’s a philosophy.
You’re missing the point…
Maybe your point isn’t the only one trying to be made.
Would you like to share with the class what point you’re trying to make?
E: this person still has not answered.
You cannot advertise the fediverse to people already on the fediverse. They are already using it.
You need to advertise to people who are on things like twitch, Facebook, X etc.
This stream is not for you, thus it is twitch specific.
So people on the Fediverse shouldn’t be allowed to participate?
May I ask that you start?
Can you explain to me why promoting the Feddiverse on Twitch is bad?
Promoting the Feddiverse on the Feediverse just seem like preaching to the choir.
No, you said someone else’s point was trying to be made and now you’re deflecting. I asked you first. You answer mine and then we can move on to yours.
That yours is not the only voice that matters. That other people are allowed to convey ideas and the world isnt just waiting with baited breath for you to bless us with yours.
What does any of that have to do with your doctor analogy?
Well, at least I’m not alone.
I couldn’t have been more clear…
Clearly.
I’d say it holds up even more. All sick people go to hospitals and that’s where we employs doctors. EFF’s target audience[1] are using Twitch so they go there.
1: I assume, since why would they use Twitch otherwise?
Yes, once again, that’s why this analogy does not make sense. The EFF is not running a hospital, they’re running a livestream, which can happen in any of a dozen different places simultaneously.
And all their patients are on twitch.
They aren’t.
You have to meet your audience where they are at. Twitch makes a lot of sense and has a lot of reach.
You can reach your audience from a variety of channels. At least one of them should be free. This should be seeringly obvious to an org like EFF.
Well that website links to livestream.eff.org, and that page says the stream will be “simulcast”, i.e. mirrored, to Twitch and Youtube. So the main channel is indeed free.
YouTube is not any more free than Twitch…?
Oh damn. I meant their website, but I didn’t notice they just embed a Twitch stream on their website, thought it was a self-hosted stream. Never mind me.