• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, they said “it’s a transphobic dog whistle” and you invented all that extra stuff to start your irrelevant argument. It’s called a straw man.

      • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I didn’t invent anything.

        Really?

        “it’s a totally useless term that can only be used as a dogwhistle.”

        This you?

        If you can’t see the strawmanning here, you’re one or more of unselfaware, unable to back down when you’re wrong, disingenuous or malicious.

          • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            And there you go pretending context doesn’t exist. Amazing.

            That’s not a strawman or an invention, it’s literally what the person was saying.

            You and I clearly use the word literally very differently. I use it considerably more honestly and literally than you do.

            If you can’t see the strawmanning here, you’re one or more of unselfaware, unable to back down when you’re wrong, disingenuous or malicious.

            I’m leaning towards options (b) and © here.

              • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Like I say, you and I use the word “literally” very, very differently.

                When I say something like “they literally said it”, I mean that they actually said it. You know, that that was what they said. Literally.

                When you use that phrase, you mean “that’s how I interpreted it because I wanted to argue about it. All day.”

                  • Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    It’s completely accurate to say “literally” while paraphrasing.

                    1. No is isn’t. Use words like “essentially” for that. “It’s literally what they said” is in fact a lie.
                    2. Especially not when inventing a bunch of absolutism that wasn’t there and interpreting it with a whole bunch of extra, much easier to debunk nonsense that you added yourself.

                    people insisted that sex has no meaningful use even in medical contexts.

                    I didn’t see that in this thread. Oh, unless you’re meaning it “literally” with your version of the word “literally” which doesn’t man literally literally and for some reason includes absurd straw man content.