Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

  • Pogbom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Why are “the poors” buying expensive guns? If you’re buying a tool that can accidentally and instantly murder someone very easily, and you have no way to pay for that mistake, then gun ownership is too expensive for you.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      1. Not all guns are expensive. Single barrel shotguns start around $200.
      2. It’s an individual right, which a large body of jurisprudence has ruled cannot have ‘undue onerous’ limitations or fees. Talk to your legislators or court officials on that one, but that’s the law atm.
      • Pogbom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        “Undue” is a word with a huge range of meaning though. You’re buying a device whose sole purpose is to kill or injure, and it’s exceptionally good at doing those things accidentally. If you want to own a device like that, accident insurance is not all undue.

        In fact it’s kinda surprising that people can get guns without it. I feel like in an alternate universe where gun insurance was the norm, people would think it’s insane to remove that requirement. It’s a requirement for cars which are now less deadly than guns and arguably way more important to people’s survival, but people think gun ownership is such a marker of liberty that they’re willing to put the rest of society at risk for it.