- 310 Posts
- 3.26K Comments
21·3 days agoThere’s not much more cringe than people from the imperial core calling other people “terrorists”.
The poll, published by the research firm and the Walton Family Foundation… Walton Family Foundation provides financial support to The 74.
What kind of fool would believe anything from these grifters?
Phony AF at its face.
27·5 days agoAnd during the Biden administration.
I dunno why people even care about this bullshit pseudo-science. The study is dumb AF. The dude didn’t even use real resumes. He had an LLM generate TEN fake resumes and then the “result” is still within any reasonable margin of error. Reading this article is like watching a clown show.
It’s all phony smoke and mirrors. Clickbait. The usual “AI” grift.
Handpicked poor study… That’s what this whole OP is about.
1·6 days agoYou mean like LockedOut?
It’s outperforming “messier” problems with a much lower success rate.
Classic pseudo-science for the modern grifter. Vague definitions, sloppy measurements, extremely biased, wild unsupported predictions, etc.
Michelle Obama. Less baggage (for better or worse). More beloved.
True.
But a problem is that (as usual) it’s not actually “AI” to find patterns using statistics.
These corporations are literally willing to murder people in order to make a buck off some phony “medical superintelligence”.
Why would I trust these liars with my life? They’re completely anti-science.
AI applications
There’s no “AI” involved here.
Somehow I doubt these corporate press releases.
Microsoft
Somehow I really doubt these corporate press releases.
The Path to Medical Superintelligence
Somehow I really really doubt these corporate press releases.
The doctor who review the case, maybe ?
Yeah that’s why these gains in “efficiency” are completely imaginary.
“Science” under capitalism has always been funded and developed by/for fascists. The originals in the USA were the founding enslavers. The nazis had their time. Now it’s the zios. R&D for genocide as usual.
Stephen Miller?
It’s sort of like that… Except instead of a bunch of regular people sharing music, it’s a bunch of capitalists stealing all art for profit. Ofc the major difference is that’s it’s legal for capital.
It depends on your definition of “is”. In reality it depends on the original art and how it’s transformed. But legally it’s whatever benefits capital (aka your boss). I wouldn’t bet against your boss paying off the courts, lawyers, etc.
If a pact between enslavers is a complete failure, why not just make another one? \s
Wow you mean the state serves capital? I thought for sure it would once again fight for the rights of artists and their extremely profitable IP. \s \s \s
Downvoting for two reasons:
No they didn’t.
Duh ofc.