• 644 Posts
  • 3.52K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 19th, 2024

help-circle






























  • As a “mathematician”… Yeah this is phony AF. Typical “AI” bullshit.

    The field of application of Grothendieck’s toposes goes beyond the strictly mathematical framework. It makes it possible to connect literary works, which seem at first glance to have nothing in common, as evidenced by the connection between Homer’s The Iliad, Kurāʿ’s al-Muntakhab and Dostoyevsky’s The Idiot. This connection could in turn enrich research on topos, if it is taken seriously as an archeology [20], which invites to deepen the knowledge of things beyond binary oppositions to explore how things are formed

    lmao. fraud. Foucault is cool and all, but dude was not writing about categories and sheaves. Not even close.

    With Poincaré, we discover that building a bridge between things –a topos– can arise from an intuition

    lol no. They can’t just call anything a “topos”. That’s not how math works. This paper is entertaining but that’s about it.