This is definitely a grift.

it uses “wetware” … to process information and support “AI” systems

Most importantly, “AI” doesn’t exist. Secondly there is absolutely zero “AI” technologies that need “support” from these petri dishes.

the technology could complement AI

Hmmm… Later in the article it changes from “it uses to support AI” to “it could complement AI”. Curious.

Actually the first quote from OP isn’t even in the article. Did they update it because it’s fake?

“The people building [data centers] earnestly believe that [they] could kill us all by the end of the decade,” Coxon wrote in that same post.

FTFY

Yep.

https://techcrunch.com/2026/09/08/openai-fought-dirty-on-career-making-math-problem-says-nyu-mathematician/

Empire has always entertained itself with trivialities while murdering people abroad. It’s a major foundation of “technology” in USA, although not nearly as important as the MIC.

Ok cool… But what about the other factor?

(jk)

The main difference is that rockets are expressly for the purpose of murdering people, so I would argue that the research shouldn’t be continued or done at all.

Fortunately I’m pretty sure that people developing these computer programs are serious about trying not to murder people - even if just for legal reasons.

How do you measure that?

The other day I did a google search for a basic JavaScript function. Gemini gave me almost the exact function that I needed. Should I have closed my eyes or smashed my head with a hammer until I forgot? Ofc I used it. It was the first result, helpful, and easy.

I don’t believe in “AI” since it doesn’t exist, but these augmented or summarized searches can definitely be helpful. I imagine it’s the same with other LLMs, search engines, etc.

People are begging to regulate “AI” when it doesn’t even exist and there’s not even an objective definition.

Absolute recipe for failure or worse.

Yes, debugging with an LLM is absolutely as bad as murder. Probably worse! \s

also the number of bugs is not a bottomless pit.

Are you forgetting about Microsoft?

Yes, but this has always been the case before and after this phony “AI” bullshit.

Avoiding false statements achieves scientific accuracy and honest progress rather than grifting and bullshit.

And TBH it’s not at all difficult for me to distinguish between my computer and a human.

That’s a core part of the grift. Even people who supposed hate “AI” still promote this kind of anthropomorphic disinformation. It’s rampant.

Pretty wild seeing a programmer anthropomorphize their applications and mislabel them as “AI”.

The Big Lai runs deep.

why people treat AI-generated code like it’s the Plague 2

It’s just another part of the grift. The so-called “resistance” actually promotes the Big Lai that “AI” exists.

Clickbait feeding the Big Lai.

In reality there was no “AI” involved because it doesn’t exist.

Dude used a LLM which is a statistical program with absolutely zero “intelligence”.

I don’t say this often but… Dank gif.

The very large, genocidal side thinks nuking people is great.

wannabe-macho small-penis dudebro idiot voters

USA in a nutshell.

There’s no “war with Iran”. When did it begin? When did it end?

In reality it’s been decades/centuries of genocidal imperial terrorism in an attempt to violently control the region, the people, and resources there.