

Despite Employee Activism, Capital Is Still Supporting Fascism, Genocide, Planetary Destruction, etc.
FTFY


Despite Employee Activism, Capital Is Still Supporting Fascism, Genocide, Planetary Destruction, etc.
FTFY


The victims are the right color so he’s got a chance.


The real morons are the people who vote


Has he set a date to annex the oil and mineral reserves of Nigeria?
Pretty sure this has been ongoing for decades.


FIFA is just a club for racist colonial grifters… Trump should be president of FIFA.


The last thing that humanity needs is this fucking creep “saving” more kids.


If dude wanted ww3, he would attack a fellow empire (russia, china, etc).
Instead he’s just another coward murdering the poorest people on earth.
Like any president.


Pretty sure both of these are christian/white supremacists conspiracy theories. Definitely just racist conspiracies about Nigeria.


I’m just so grateful that all the previous presidents refused to do this and setup safeguards to ensure that Trump will be punished. \s \s \s


Ofc. Fascism is just internal imperialism. Following in the footsteps of biden and every other president.


paedophile … maths … praeganant
too british. i’m out.


The purpose of the “AI” grift is to shovel as much money as possible from marks to grifters.
Whether the “bubble” pops or not, that’s a concern for the marks.


“Funny” how nazism and zionism often work together. Fash support fash.


As a “mathematician”… Yeah this is phony AF. Typical “AI” bullshit.
The field of application of Grothendieck’s toposes goes beyond the strictly mathematical framework. It makes it possible to connect literary works, which seem at first glance to have nothing in common, as evidenced by the connection between Homer’s The Iliad, Kurāʿ’s al-Muntakhab and Dostoyevsky’s The Idiot. This connection could in turn enrich research on topos, if it is taken seriously as an archeology [20], which invites to deepen the knowledge of things beyond binary oppositions to explore how things are formed
lmao. fraud. Foucault is cool and all, but dude was not writing about categories and sheaves. Not even close.
With Poincaré, we discover that building a bridge between things –a topos– can arise from an intuition
lol no. They can’t just call anything a “topos”. That’s not how math works. This paper is entertaining but that’s about it.


Can always count on the dems for barely doing something completely ineffectual…


It actually mattes what shitty “analogy” he uses, because he’s implicitly endorsing prohibition and its ongoing, extreme violence. It’s a typical hegemonic tactic to normalize state violence. Dude is an alumni of the nytimes ofc. This is literally his whole career.


Another shill for the NYTimes… Check their op/ed pages. Full of worthless libs saying dumb shit.
I think we should have two options that are basically the same, then incite endless hoopla over which is better. Similar to coke vs pepsi.