Yep. This is a setting I put in for my instance only, not hard-coded.

Various domains have warnings for different things.

That’s interesting.

How much ram did it use while running?

If you used a GPU, how much does it cost in today’s prices?

Log into your account and change your display name in the settings.

Ah that is interesting, I missed that the first time.

So the author instance would be responsible for federating activities, not the instance hosting the community? That could be very beneficial for spreading load across the network! But maybe it would complicate moderation because the author could ignore moderator’s commands to delete the post and stop federating it.

They took the link down.

I have a copy - https://join.piefed.social/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/evidence-llm-used-for-banning.txt

I prefer to receive individual vote activities because then my blocks and defederations will remove votes from instances that I don’t want.

e.g. I’m using instance A and subscribed to a community on instance B. Posts in there receive votes from instance C but because I’ve defederated from C (for vote manipulation, perhaps), none of the votes from C have any effect on me. They would have an effect on B and that’s good - it’s up to them.

Nah. I discussed it with Unruffled days ago. Here’s a screenshot from Matrix in the Threadiverse Admins room:

It’s at least one admin, we don’t know how widely it’s used. It does have the logo of a group of 3 instances (Fediverse Anarchist Flotilla), so it seems to be made to be used by many people in an ongoing way.

More details at: https://piefed.social/c/fediverse@lemmy.world/p/2035379/proof-of-ai-assisted-political-profiling-by-unruffled-lemmy-dbzer0-com

Daily.

The assessment of samskara was broadly correct in that case, I’m not disputing that. And yes, in his own definition, he is a Zionist.

I looked in the mod log.

Well, the cat is out of the bag now. Might as well show the whole story.

That told me everything I need to know about how much to trust the summaries…. very little. I honestly don’t think they are much of a value add, because you just can’t reliably trust the results. In any case, we have absolutely no plans to use llms for that on a regular basis, I just wanted to see what it came up with, and how well it matched a manual assessment.

Lies.

You provided a link to that assessment as proof that a ban was warranted. Here’s a screenshot from the mod log:

That link goes to https://s.faf-pb.xyz/lXxek if anyone wants to take a look

Ahh sorry - I just checked more closely. It’s an admin doing it.

Ahhh no no it’s not a bot - the moderator is using OpenAI to check if a user has said anything that makes them a promoter of a political ideology that they consider to be bannable.

The human mod still presses the ban button themselves, manually.

I agree.

Compare https://lemmy.world/?dataType=Post&listingType=All&sort=Hot with https://piefed.social/home/hot/all for example.

Yep

Check this out - https://www.structural-integrity.eu/the-politics-of-decentralization-and-the-libertarian-allure-of-mastodon/

Yeah you can do that but now you’re on my do-not-trust list. And probably a few other people’s lists.

I appreciate you being open about your opinions because now I can make an more informed choice about interacting with you and the instance you run.

Don’t you think everyone deserves the information they need to choose which instances they want to interact with, according to whatever criteria is important to them? Even if your criteria are different?

you are free to leave and choose a different one.

I only have that freedom if the admin tells me that they use LLMs in this manner or if they federate with instances that do. At the moment everyone is in the dark.

You’re hyperfocusing on one point, as if that’s the only part that matters and ignoring all the rest. I don’t consider that helpful, hence the downvote.

What is especially unhelpful is abusing your admin access to call out people’s votes. Leave that shit alone.