LM741 opamp chips

There’s also https://lmstudio.ai/

Found the original tweet. Seems to be real.

https://x.com/americasgreat/status/1680292565201944578

https://vger.app

It’s a web app

◖|◔◡◉|◗

You have to be careful when looking at crosstabs. 600 is the total sample size. How many of those were black?

https://youtu.be/jYFefppqEtE

The most logical explanation is (and always has been) a SS agent accidentally scratched his ear while he kept trying to stand up.

There’s blood on his hand right after he touches his ear, before he even ducks down

https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/1e2q931/the_photograph_sequence_of_the_bullet_that_hit/

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/photo-path-trump-assassination.html

Dozens of us did! 😁

Do they say what phone it was?

C-SPAN video: https://www.c-span.org/video/?c5123735/shots-fired-trump-rally

Imgur mirror: https://imgur.com/a/TqPqVVn

Lots of other websites have already copied the “pay or consent” ad model

I’ve seen this mentioned a few times before but never get how it works. How do you even use TikTok as a search engine?

The only evidence to overturn the election points to republicans

Bad bot

Wat

Then you are totally locked in with Apple devices and cannot switch to Android and take your passkeys with you

Typical 1-off error

Now thinking about it in terms of mathematical logic, the DoJ and Supreme Court‘s interpretations is wrong:

It’s actually a law of logic (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws) that says that:

not (A and B and C)

is equal to

(not A) or (not B) or (not C)

—

In this case:

The defendant is eligible for relief if he does not (A and B and C)

Which is the same as

The defendant is a eligible for relief if he does (not A) or (not B) or (not C)

—

Which is not what the DoJ is saying. The DoJ is saying that

not (A and B and C)

is equal to

(not A) and (not B) and (not C)