Sad so many people are afraid of the content that they down vote.

Technically, none of those examples is built in obsolescence. It works the same as the day you bought it without those features. It may not live upto what you want, but that is not built in obsolescence.

I think you mean the consumer. Odds are that your last cell phone still worked, but “the consumer” wanted newer features, faster interfaces, new security, longer battery life, new OS, etc. At this point, the obsolescence is almost entirely in the mind of the consumer

Those reports might effect investments from the smaller players, but the big names(Google, Microsoft, Meta, etc.) are locked in a race to the finish line. So their investments will continue until one of them reaches the goal…[insert sunk cost fallacy here]…and I think we’re at least 1-2 years from there.

Edit: posted too soon

They don’t build the chips at all. They pay tsmc.

Couldn’t agree more. There is quite a bit of AI vaporware but NVIDIA is the real stuff and will weather whatever storm comes with ease.

but I believe that’s not correct anymore.

Why do you believe that? As far as I understand, other HW exists…but no SW to run on it…

I guess I just have an ancient phone that can’t display it. I see it on the photos that people posted with the contrast turned up…but can’t see it at all on the original.

Trusty s10e finally showing its age…

I don’t see the hue in the screenshot

Great questions. Honestly, I haven’t given it much though.

What would determine whether a source is added?

Hard question. Open to suggestions. Even if a post starts off with a click-bait-y title/source, our member typically post concrete sources and more resources in the comments. The discussions are a large part of the community and, as of now, we are not overrun with bad sources/posts. I inclined to create a plan, but not implement until we have more issues. I’d like to say the community decides, but it could lead to endless polls about sources. Thoughts?

Frequency of reports?

Absolutely would be one metric. So far, we get very, very, very few reports in the Space community. Mostly the reports are to remove trolls or unrelated content.

Moderator discretion?

It would probably start here. Not sure I’m comfortable making those decisions, but this is likely the reality until we have more discussions and decide on a path forward.

Community vote?

This would be pretty great…just not sure how to go about it. I guess we could sticky a vote post for a few weeks or something.

Could a source ever be removed from the list if its quality improves?

We would have to have a mechanism for this. Times change. So do journals/magazines/periodicals.

I believe that Otter is correct, there is no way to restrict domains on a community level. So this would be managed by the mods supported by reports from the community.

This comment, in true republican fashion, blames the opposition for what they are guilty of…

Yes. Fixed now. I’m super frustrated by the way lemmy overwrites the URL when you add an image.

I very much dislike how lemmy overwrites the URL after you include an image…

Thanks for linking.

I’m torn. On one hand, I’m fine with removing poor sources as there is so much garbage on the internet it’s good to keep it from invading all spaces. On the other hand, there’s some good discussion here…but it could be mainly about how garbage the article is…

Overall, there have been very few reports for poor sources/spam/fake articles. So report it and we’ll start removing it. This means we should probably compile a “deny list” for inappropriate sources.

Phys.org again printing anything that’s sent their way…I get tired of the endless drivel from phys.org

You didn’t link a map or an article, FYI. It’s just a single photo of the perseverance backshell.

Recently got the pixel tablet and put GrapheneOS on it. I’ve been quite satisfied with it so far.

Honestly, I’m not upto date on the goals of this mission, but I really like thinking about a quadcopter (or dual quad) flying around on titan.

Your replies show you are too deeply involved in illusions to ever escape and make yourself smarter…

Make things up much?