flop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 vuotta sittenEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square352linkfedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down122file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldandroid@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.57Karrow-down1external-linkEpic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fightwww.theverge.comflop_leash_973@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 vuotta sittenmessage-square352linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldandroid@lemmy.world
minus-squareDarkhoof@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up56arrow-down2·2 vuotta sittenIn the US it does.
minus-squareTheMurphy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up44arrow-down1·2 vuotta sittenYes, but US favour companies over people.
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 vuotta sittenI’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.
minus-squareRogueBanana@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·2 vuotta sittenThat’s why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.
minus-squareagitatedpotato@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-22 vuotta sittenAnd it’s two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?
minus-squareMr_Blott@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down1·2 vuotta sittenYeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol
minus-squareaidan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 vuotta sittenI’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US
In the US it does.
Yes, but US favour companies over people.
I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US.
That’s why we are surprised. But given this went through, maybe they could go for it again who knows.
And it’s two companies fighting, how far did the anti monopoly pushes against apple and google get before Epic took them up because they were a profitable venture?
Yeah but they also have more rights than the consumer, rather than the other way about lol
I’m pretty sure the ruling in this post is in the US