Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-21 年前If a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?message-squaremessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down14
arrow-up161arrow-down1message-squareIf a country was confident they developed a technology that would act as a fool proof deterrent against nuclear attacks what would that mean for the rest of the world?Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-21 年前message-square49linkfedilink
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·1 年前They already have - having Nukes.
minus-squarekent_eh@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前 They already have - having Nukes. That only defends against a sane leadership with a military chain of command that isn’t compromised.
minus-squareFreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.auBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Seems to have gone pretty well for the last 80 years or so. Don’t see any reason why that would change.
minus-squareblarghly@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 年前Also, if you meant that a country created some sort of perfect defence against nukes, then every other country would immediately start pouring money into creating their own version, while working on ways of subverting the new technology.
They already have - having Nukes.
That only defends against a sane leadership with a military chain of command that isn’t compromised.
Seems to have gone pretty well for the last 80 years or so. Don’t see any reason why that would change.
sigh
Nm
Also, if you meant that a country created some sort of perfect defence against nukes, then every other country would immediately start pouring money into creating their own version, while working on ways of subverting the new technology.