• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    You don’t actually have to fill out the ballot. You can tell the voting officer that you decline it, you can write profanity on it, or you can vote for your dog.

    It’s a minor civic duty. Much less onerous than jury duty, lol

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And you should be free to do that by not having to interact with someone

      your options are shite and I refuse them all is a valid vote, why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?

      • otp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        your options are shite and I refuse them all is a valid vote, why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?

        The only way that’s communicated is by officially declining the ballot. And I agree with the other commenter that it should be easier to do this.

        By not voting, you’re communicating “They’re all fine; I can’t be assed to pick”.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?

        Ironically, that’s THE main reason for people not voting.

        I never miss a chance to vote and I don’t advocate for others not to vote, but I understand how some people would balk at overcoming a shitload of hurdles (including but not limited to several hours in lines surrounded by too many people, difficulties getting a valid ID etc) in order to vote for the lesser evil, which is still an evil.

        If you make it easier to vote, including without having to have onerous interactions with people, mandatory voting isn’t such a hassle and neither is voluntary voting.