I’ve seen neighborhoods that advertise as “active adult living” and are 55+ only. Given that age is a protected class, how can that do that? How is that not the same as an “active white living” community that bans other races?

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a law called HOPA that says it’s legal. You can have white only neighborhoods if you have the laws, until someone challenges them, changes them, etc. There’s a specific allowance for old people and nobody wants to take it away enough to have changed it.

    • ramble81@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Thank you. So this is like the weed is legal at a state level but not federal type of things?

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s definitely more federal than something like our roads. Fair Housing is a civil rights era law that is federal, and HOPA is a modification to those older laws. I don’t know how a state would break that, or if it’s reasonably possible.

        All I meant by the white neighborhood thing is to say that contradictions in laws only matter if you challenge them, and it’s unlikely people will want to “fix” this law when it’s aimed at helping old people, especially ones who are sick or close to death.

        • ramble81@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Agree with the “challenge” it part. It feels like they’re using the “sick” part as a loophole because most of these are affluent neighborhoods with golf courses and manicured yards.