Nemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前HDMI 2.2 will require new “Ultra96” cables, whenever we have 8K TVs and contentarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square102linkfedilinkarrow-up1228arrow-down11cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1227arrow-down1external-linkHDMI 2.2 will require new “Ultra96” cables, whenever we have 8K TVs and contentarstechnica.comNemeski@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square102linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 年前That’s why I added it as an addendum. Even sourcing HDMI cables without HDCP is getting very very rare.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 年前TBF, I will say I’ve never been hit by HDCP. I’m not sure I’d recognize it. Then again, I don’t try to copy video from over a display cable; it just seems like adding an unnecessary middleman. But I oppose it in principle. Edit: “born” -> “hit”. WTF
minus-squareapfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 年前HDCP and media production are often at odds with each other. It is broad overreach of content protection. It is super frustrating.
That’s why I added it as an addendum. Even sourcing HDMI cables without HDCP is getting very very rare.
TBF, I will say I’ve never been hit by HDCP. I’m not sure I’d recognize it. Then again, I don’t try to copy video from over a display cable; it just seems like adding an unnecessary middleman. But I oppose it in principle.
Edit: “born” -> “hit”. WTF
HDCP and media production are often at odds with each other. It is broad overreach of content protection. It is super frustrating.