I’m asking because as a light-skinned male, I always use the standard Simpsons yellow. I don’t really see other light-skinned people using an emoji that matches their skin tone, but often do see people of color use them. Maybe white people don’t naturally realize a need to be explicit with emoji skin-tone or perhaps it’s seen as implicitly identifying or requesting white privilege.

  • Is there a significance to using skin-tone emojis, and if so, what is it?

  • Assuming there might be a racial movement attached to the first question, how does my use of emojis, both Simpsons yellow and light-skin, interact with or contribute to that?

Note: I am an autistic white Latino-American cis-gendered man that aims to be socially just.

Autistic text stim: blekh 😝 blekh 😝 blekh 😝 blekh 😝 blekh 😝 !!

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why would someone want to add gendered pronouns to a language

    • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      For a same reason they want to add emojis with different color skins? Stupidity, thoughtlessnes and virtue signaling.

    • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why would someone want to add gendered pronouns to a language

      For adding specificity to lamguage. If you are talking about several people, the disambiguation can be handy.

      We could have add pronouns that distinguish by size, or age, etc.

      The really stupid feature of most indo-european is the arbitrary gendering of most nouns.

      • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I like how Japanese does it, just call people by names and titles instead. 2nd person and 3rd pronouns exist but are only rarely used.