• NTSync coming in Kernel 6.11 for better Wine/Proton game performance and porting.
  • Wine-Wayland last 4/5 parts left to be merged before end of 2024
  • Wayland HDR/Game color protocol will be finished before end of 2024
  • Nvidia 555/560 will be out for a perfect no stutter Nvidia performance
  • KDE/Gnome reaching stability and usability with NO FKN ADS
  • VR being usable
  • More Wine development and more Games being ported
  • Better LibreOffice/Word compatibility
  • Windows 10 coming to EOL
  • Improved Linux simplicity and support
  • Web-native apps (Including Msft Office and Adobe)
  • .Net cross platform (in VSCode or Jetbrains Rider)

What else am I missing?

  • wahming@monyet.ccEnglish
    2·
    7 months ago

    Yeah, honestly given the time this has been at play I’m surprised nobody has tried to do that type of full control integration besides Google. Given how well ChromeOS and especially Android worked as platforms why hasn’t… I don’t know, Valve? Adobe? Apple, even? tried to create a major desktop PC take on Linux that does have the type of support and sensible UX you want out of the box?

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      1·
      7 months ago

      Well, no, that’s not applicable here. I’m suggesting a proprietary, corporate-backed desktop default in the way we have a proprietary, corporate-backed laptop reference in ChromeOS, a corporate-backed mobile reference in Android and a proprietary, corporate-backed handheld default in SteamOS.

      It’s not about covering everyone’s use cases, it’s about applying commercial priorities and funding to one specific use case.

      I mean, you know the Linux community craves that opportunity, because the amount of hype around SteamOS when that dropped on the Deck was insane, and despite their clear lack of interest in expanding it into a Windows alternative for other product types there’s been no pushback in those circles.

      • wahming@monyet.ccEnglish
        2·
        7 months ago

        proprietary, corporate-backed desktop

        But how does that differ from Fedora or Ubuntu, besides popularity?

        • MudMan@fedia.io
          1·
          7 months ago

          That’s a fair point. I suppose conceptually that’s what those organizations were trying to do. So it’s a failure in execution which then probably acts as a deterrent for other corporations considering stepping up to challenge MS on modular desktop PCs, which aren’t that big of a market in the first place.

          I guess if you were going to do that you’d pair it to rigid hardware instead for that reason and at that point you’re Apple and we’re talking about MacOS.