• WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    So You think they shouldn’t have done anything, because the union is not big enough? Moral is not an option with a small union? Am I getting this right?

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think it depends on the goal. If I’m trying to stop a corporation from doing something profitable a large union, one that contains most corpo workers, including the ones producing this profit, can strike, halting the production that generates this profit. The union could do this for a moral reason. If the union however contains for the sake of argument 1% of the workers and none of the ones doing the work in question, then staging a protest can’t force a stop to the morally reprehensible production. It also makes this 1% an easy target to get rid of thus making it harder to organize more workers needed to stop production. So if I wanted to gain this power over the corpo, I would probably protest outside of union capacity.

      E: They’re already gone…

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, american employee protection sucks … Where I live you could easily fight being fired for this. So maybe thats where our different stances come from.