I meant they are not self-sufficient in tech but they can fulfill those needs by importing from China and India.

Many effects took place. That said I think you’re wrong about the speed of the effects. There were quick and sizeable effects. However Russia simply reshuffled the economy. Russia, or any country, doesn’t need to export or import anything if they’re self sufficient. They can replace the lost income from those exports with public investment into something else. For example military production and soldiers. And that’s what they did. Now Russia isn’t self sufficient but China has filled the gap for their high tech import needs and is taking Russian fossil fuels in exchange. So is India. Given that Russia has both markets for its export and sources for its necessary imports, I don’t believe there’s any further effects from sanctions we could expect. That’s how I read the tea leaves anyway.

Doesn’t Israel subsidize and support these settlements?

Yeah, it’s comparing apples to oranges to say there’s lots of apples. Sure there’s lots of apples.

Then there’s the thumbnail chart hinting something is crashing when that’s not happening. So far they’ve demonstrated significant resilience against the sanctions we’ve imposed and their economy has remained stable and returned to growth. If they don’t run out of labor and natural resources, they can keep this going for a very long time. I’m not saying this because I want them to be able to. I’m saying it because I’m disappointed at the propaganda in our politics and media that lead us to believe we can crash Russia’s economy. This created unrealistic expectations and it probably contributed to the lesser support ro weapons delivery which has led us to the status quo we face today.

Running useful CLI programs. A non exhaustive list:

• ssh
  • Operating remote machines over ssh
  • Port forwarding to remote machines
• iperf
• ping
• nmap
• pandoc

https://mastodon.archive.org/@brewsterkahle/113304263804387160

Fediverse source

I think that’s some irresponsible shit right here. Whether or not she thinks that, she has to maneuver around the bad perceptions of the current presidency at least in words. Saying what she said is a godsend to Trump’s campaign.

And its sibling Shelter. Don’t know which one is more up-to-date lately.

Indispensable.

Wow, what’s happening at NYT? Stuff like this could ruffle some feathers.

You can’t have one set of laws for small companies and another set of laws for large companies.

This is false. We can, and we do. Antitrust laws are one example off the top of my head. There are probably others. The assumption that every actor has to pay the same price is false as well. There are countless examples for this.

This view is a bit naive in that it doesn’t take into account a lot of variables. It favors established large actors in their ability to extract and accumulate ever more value from the ones they link.

Perhaps if he does that, then Joe and Harris will be forced to materially change their tune and take some real action in an attempt to save the elction.

Didn’t basically everyone resume UNRWA funding after looking at the evidence? You’d think they wouldn’t have done that if the allegations were credible enough.

I thought “X is Hamas” is a fairly well established meme on Lemmy by this point.

You’re either perpetuating the deep sarcasm or you ain’t reading right. 😅 If the former - applause.

Seems like UN is Hamas.

I know sarcasm but this might actually not be a bad idea. Throw a couple of paragraphs of historical facts in those stories for people to really get the context. Like how many articles and discussions state what happened on Oct 7 before they start talking about anything related afterwards. A brief list of major historical events along with some numbers on casualties.

Wow this tool does not look great, it highlights “surrender or starve” and “great force” as misleading information when they’re direct quotes.

The rest of the “analysis” isn’t much better. It seems like someone has let an LLM do things it can’t.

Do you mean via QEMU without hardware acceleration?