• glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 days ago

    I don’t even follow him but I know that’s bullshit lol

    The ONLY difference is his criticism of Israel? Really?

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Perfection is the enemy of good, AOC is not perfect but she’s hell of a lot better then the majority of dems.

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 days ago

              yes she is better but that’s not saying much about democrats since they’ve helped lower the bar so much that it’s a tripping hazard in hell.

              more importantly: genocide and ethnic-cleansing aren’t just “other issues” – they’re red lines that prove how little humanity and basic fucking human decency a person has within them.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Oh I’m sorry I didn’t realize UBI, universal healthcare, and being pro-China are standard Democrat positions.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          This is what the Democratic Party does; it’s who they are. They’re willing to feign support for anything their voters want just as long as there’s no chance that they can pass it. They won control of Congress in the 2006 midterm elections by pretending they wanted to compel an end to the Iraq War and Bush surveillance and interrogation abuses because they knew they would not actually do so; and indeed, once they were given the majority, the Democratic-controlled Congress continued to fund the war without conditions, to legalize Bush’s eavesdropping program, and to do nothing to stop Bush’s habeas and interrogation abuses (“Gosh, what can we do? We just don’t have 60 votes).

          greenwald called it 16 years ago and harry byrd predating manchin or sinema by over a half century proves that democrats have been doing this longer than most of us have been alive – it’s called the ratchet effect.

          racheting

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            Not addressing anything your opponent has said in favor of bringing up some unrelated point has a name – it’s called “monologuing”

            • eldavi@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              and disregarding evidence that directly addresses your opponent’s point is called “willful ignorance” – it’s fitting that liberals exhibit it as much as maga does.