• PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    If it’s a great policy stance, they should do it now when they know they have control of both legislatures. Why wait?

          • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            Right, so what they’re doing is not a great policy stance, contrary to what you said earlier.

            Bernie didn’t have the power to deliver on his promises without winning the election, Trump already won and has control of all three branches. It’s objectively massively different to Bernie, or any other office-seeking politician, running on a platform of what they would try to do once elected. It’s the difference between, “Here’s what I’ll try to accomplish if I win,” and “Here’s something I could do now but I won’t, I’ll only do it later and only if you vote how I say.” I’d argue it’s closer to extortion than a bribe, but no matter what you call it, it’s a terrible, evil policy stance.

            • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Look, if Trump campaigned tomorrow that he would uncap the house and end exceptions to the antislavery ammendment, I’d call all of you motherfuckers as you are for repeating his lies.

              • PapaStevesy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                That’s a yummy looking word salad you’ve tossed up there, don’t forget the dressing! Ooh, and croutons, 😋😋😋