• Cris_Citrus (he/him <3)@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Only if that scale happens across the current number of servers. If the server base grows along with users the manual management may scale much better

    • Hal@piefed.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Unfortunately Lemmy has one major problem when it comes to banning spam bots. Only the instance that a user belongs to can ban the user in a way that federates to other instances. This means if that particular instance doesn’t quickly ban the user, then hundreds of other instances need to do it manually. Currently, a pretty significant percentage of spammers get banned individually by many instances.

      If we had 100x as many users and 100x as many instances, we would have 100x as many bot accounts for every instance to ban.

      The solution is probably something like shared ban lists or ban mirroring (setting an instance up to ban every user that some trusted instance bans). But right now it’s just people clicking, and it’s not scalable.

      • Raphael@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        This could be mitigated quite easily by having a clear separation between instances run for users and instances for communities.

        • Hal@piefed.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Can you explain some more? I don’t get how this separation helps unless you keep a small number of community instances.

          • Raphael@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yes, I think you get it. My assumption is that there would be a lot less of “community instances” compared to “user instances”.