• fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck this is dark.

    If the people profiting from this were to be executed when the system cost the first human life, it wouldn’t make it to a proposal.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah except we live in a capitalism dystopian hellhole. The people who brought this idea to fruition will be celebrated by the Epstein Class; for saving money and getting rid of the poors.

    • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is Louisiana. The cost in human life was a selling point everywhere except official documents.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes it is dark:

      This is intended to handle the increase of calls that are related to one incident, so callers get automatically routed to an AI agent who asks if they are calling regarding the incident. If the answer is yes, then callers can receive information or updates, and if it’s no, then the callers are transferred to a human.

      This combats multitudes of calls piling up and taking longer time to potentially answer an emergency call. The OPCD said the AI will not be used to handle emergency calls, only to direct such calls to a human dispatcher.

      Basically they are testing this to see if they can handle multiple callers to keep the lines and operators open for new emergencies. They are testing and not being irresponsible.

      What is dark about this is that nobody even read the fucking article but jumps to conclusion on the fucking clickbait headline. We are becoming a global civilization of programmed morons where you only have to hit the right trigger word and everyone goes stupid.