Inconsistent. You stated that the king in Britain has the power to stop laws, and you’re using the fact that he has more influence than the average citizen to support that claim. Those two are not equivalent, sorry.
The king demonstrably did not have the power to stop laws from passing. People educated in Britain are taught this fact at the age of 11-13.
There is no such thing as the Royal Prerogative in Britain and the British Monarch definitely doesn’t have the Soverign’s Constitutional prerogative of Assent to Legislation.
Maybe you should learn more about the laws of your own fucking country since you clearly did not go to a proper school at the age of 11-13.
Again, the prerogative is a formality. If invoked it would be immediately rescinded. Parliament is sovereign in this country, not the monarch.
Because I know the history of this country better than you do, I know how this particular law is applied.
You seem to be having a bad day, so I’ll just stop there.
Inconsistent. You stated that the king in Britain has the power to stop laws, and you’re using the fact that he has more influence than the average citizen to support that claim. Those two are not equivalent, sorry.
The king demonstrably did not have the power to stop laws from passing. People educated in Britain are taught this fact at the age of 11-13.
Sure, mate.
There is no such thing as the Royal Prerogative in Britain and the British Monarch definitely doesn’t have the Soverign’s Constitutional prerogative of Assent to Legislation.
Maybe you should learn more about the laws of your own fucking country since you clearly did not go to a proper school at the age of 11-13.
Again, the prerogative is a formality. If invoked it would be immediately rescinded. Parliament is sovereign in this country, not the monarch.
Because I know the history of this country better than you do, I know how this particular law is applied.
You seem to be having a bad day, so I’ll just stop there.