• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Correct, but people do get value from a public road system existing. For example, I “use” roads when stuff gets delivered to me, or when a fire truck shows up to put out a fire at my neighbor’s house. My point is that when we do tax people for driving we’re carefully metering it for one group of people and charging another group a flat all-you-can-drive amount, which unfairly taxes people who don’t drive very much.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m really trying to figure out how that makes it OK to tax an EV for double per mile as compared to a prius. The only point I see you making is that roads are fucking expensive to maintain and they drain taxes from everywhere.

      • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wasn’t trying to say “Therefore it’s all OK,” so much as “none of this makes any sense, none of this has ever been fair.”

        Even non-drivers wind up paying taxes for roads.

        • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Oh if you are looking for sense from the government you are going to go mad. First lesson I learned working in a legal adjacent field. Well, second after going mad.