• TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    No, and I wasn’t trying to be profound. I meant quite literally that enforcement would be either impossible or hilariously authoritarian

    • zeroConnection@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      No, and I wasn’t trying to be profound. I meant quite literally that…

      No, your text didn’t “mean” anything, unless you think I’m a mind reader. You asked a question and I answered.

      or hilariously authoritarian

      So not impossible. And authoritarian is nothing new.

      Seems like you had all the answers all along and were trying to be profound

      • TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Hilariously authoritarian overreactions to organized labour tend to backfire. Anyway I really don’t care what you think, please go away now

        • zeroConnection@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          You’re the one trying to prove something and sound smart without any proof or valid arguments.

          FYI, it worked when Ronald Reagan fired every single Air Traffic Controller for striking. They don’t have a union to this day. Like I said, authoritarian is nothing new and it works.

          Which is why I said in another comment that it really now depends on how they respond, the American way or the French way.

          Now go educate yourself a bit before you come back to lemmy and shit your pants again, boy.