• fira@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Tax the rich you coward!!

    Seriously though, is he trying to fire a salvo in some BS culture war battle? Maybe he thinks taxing software will effectively tax ai?

    • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      This is mostly a tax in video games. Basically it’s an attack on steam.

      I’m in California. If I but a game(software) I pay tax if I do it at Best buy. If I buy it on steam I pay no sales tax.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if 99% of all software bought in stores is just video games.

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Steam already charges a state sales tax, so this isn’t at Steam. There are a lot of other smaller online stores that don’t bother with state taxes though.

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          That’s only partly correct. Steam only charges a state sales tax for states that require sales tax on its purchases. CA does not impose state sales tax on digital products, so Steam does not charge CA residents a sales tax on purchases. This is aiming to level the playing field for brick and mortar stores as well as make more money (from normal people instead of taxing billionaires).

          • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That’s interesting, I’ve seen it in multiple states and just assumed it was the standard at this point. Is CA late to the game on this because so many of the online companies lobbied against it hard in their home state?

            • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I’m not sure, but that sounds likely. We have Silicon Valley, which contains billionaires who think they are more important than other people and have no problem saying stupid stuff like, “taxing digital products will cost jobs and move companies out of CA.”

    • MysticKetchup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, taxing the average consumer more but refusing to tax billionaires is regressive and dumb as hell. Newsom is a sellout

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The exemption on silicon valley’s sales tax is a defacto subsidy of billionaires.

        • zbyte64@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Why stop there? food stamps are a subsidy for corporate ag. Public roads are a subsidy for big oil. And schools are a subsidy for all the companies that don’t educate their workers. Wow, we are very smart of have realized this

    • frog@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He works for billionaires. This is just a virtue signal to make it look like he could be taxing AI when really it’s a regressive tax that would hurt poor people the most and further save his voter base: billionaires.

      So he will never push a genuine wealth tax, but he will push red herrings.