• TheFogan@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    would it be also plausible for say vaultwarden to make it’s own client and just completely fork over if bitwarden becomes less open?

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      It’s really straightforward to fork a client, when all you have to do is plug in your own server anyway. In a worst case scenario from the company, you can continue using your current BitWarden clients (maybe something extra horrendous will happen and you’ll have to downgrade), and talented people will start forking it within a reasonable timeframe.

      • Thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        24 hours ago

        Vaultwarden has its own website. It uses the Bitwarden client though. There is - so far - no (dedicated) Vaultwarden client yet.

        • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          23 hours ago

          A new client specifically for Vaultwarden will show up if Bitwarden becomes hostiles against it and purposely sabotage the API.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Sorry I meant android/iphone apps and browser extensions. It would seem to me that’s the easier part with all the work done on making the client.