Visitors at Louvre look on in shock as Leonardo da Vinci masterpiece attacked by environmental protesters

Two environmental protesters have hurled soup on to the Mona Lisa at the Louvre in Paris, calling for “healthy and sustainable food”. The painting, which was behind bulletproof glass, appeared to be undamaged.

Gallery visitors looked on in shock as two women threw the yellow-coloured soup before climbing under the barrier in front of the work and flanking the splattered painting, their right hands held up in a salute-like gesture.

One of the two activists removed her jacket to reveal a white T-shirt bearing the slogan of the environmental activist group Riposte Alimentaire (Food Response) in black letters.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    9 months ago

    It will make the climate crisis be covered in headlines and make it harder to ignore

    No it won’t

    This IS a legitimate form of protest.

    NO, it isn’t

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        We’re talking about what idiots they are.

        Pithy quotes aside, not all publicity is good publicity.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Marches are one traditional approach. Those can be disruptive, but they don’t deliberately cause property damage to unrelated victims so that’s way better.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can get people to talk about me by taking a dump in public that isn’t the same as listening to what I have to say.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        9 months ago

        They tried to destroy a cultural icon. That’s the only topic worth talking about.

        • gregorum@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No, they didn’t. They knew it was behind the bullet proof glass and would not be harmed. They did this to draw attention to a cause. It worked.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            Half of the comments here don’t even know what cause it was for. You know you are supposed to learn by kindergarten that there is a difference between good attention and bad attention. Making a scene is easy but ineffective the vast majority of the time. Convincing people is difficult but it is the only way to get long term results.

            You must have met people like this in your life. Someone completely unable to grasp that there are others around them and they got their own needs and wants. Does that person care? No. They didn’t get what they want so now everyone has to suffer.

            • maynarkh@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Half of the comments here don’t even know what cause it was for.

              That’s because the news piece deliberately omits that part, at least from the headline. If they didn’t throw soup at an important piece of bulletproof glass, there wouldn’t even be news coverage.

                • maynarkh@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  This is not about whether the info is available at all, but if it’s loud enough in the shitstorm of information that surrounds us. If news sites don’t report on it, then most people don’t hear about it.

                  The article also goes out of the way to put the protesters in a bad light, with “Footage posted on X captured the attack on Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece as well as the gasps of visitors and the cries of children apparently shocked by the incident.”

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    You are right the article should have said how noble and wonderful they were for not destroying the painting. Everyone deserves a fucking medal for not being as shitty as they could have been

            • gregorum@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Even if I agreed with your premise (which I don’t) I think it pretty silly to use a small niche internet comment forum as a gauge for saying this didn’t work, when it’s plastered on headlines around the world. And you’re already admitting that it did work, now you’re just debating it’s effectiveness. And that’s not the point. 

                • gregorum@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Show me the legislation it will change and tell me when it will happen

                  I didn’t make that argument. I said

                  They did this to draw attention to a cause. It worked.

                  but thanks for the straw man argument and moving the goal posts.

                  if it didn’t work, then why are you still here whining about it?

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Ah thanks for admitting the goal was attention, not actual change. Say no more, I get it now. They needed some validation and they got it.

                    Hey I am a parent I get it. Except you know my kids are pretty young not grown ass adults.

            • norbert@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              ·
              9 months ago

              They clearly didn’t accidentally spill soup so I’m sure their guilt isn’t really in question.

        • Thomrade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          the Mona Lisa is behind several centimeters of glass. they have absolutely no way to date it with soup.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            9 months ago

            You know why the glass is there? Because some lunatic tried to throw pait at it. You can’t justify the act because it’s guarded against it. It’s like saying it’s OK to to launch a missle at me because you know I have an interceptor system.

        • Grayox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          Lmao no they didnt, it has been behind glass for almost 2 decades, facts dont care about your feelings.

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Well we disagree. I think protests qua protests are interesting to talk about, same for climate protests, civil rights, the role of art, the role of art conservation, and even soup is pretty interesting.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Couldn’t have just used any of the socially acceptable ways to protest? This is France ffs, they are the world leaders in organizing a protest. You piss the French off and you got a march on your hands.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yes there is no way to protest in France. No one in France has ever taken part in a demonstration complete with signs. Everyone knows that the French people just go gently into that good night when their government does something wrong. It isn’t like they have a literal holiday celebrating the storming of a jail.

                Everyone heard that? The French never protest. All the million articles you have heard about strikes and demonstrations in France never occurred.

                  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Could they vote? No? Nothing to talk about.

                    Now care to address the rest of the comment or the one gotcha you think you found?

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            In the end, I think it’s no different than religious fanatics destroying part of their culture because they disagree with it. They prove nothing. They accomplish nothing.