I’d just be like “my bad dude” and pull a little bit closer after that. What a weenie.

You seem to be confused. This isn’t a debate.

See, you don’t read.

Me: I don’t need to prove anything to you.

You: Prove me wrong.

Like, no. You can’t even read and parse one paragraph, and you want me to compile a bunch of research you won’t understand? You want me to explain the difference between a scant majority of the population who decided to and were permitted to vote and a vast majority of all people everywhere to someone who struggles with basic reading? What a laugh.

I’ve provided more facts to support my claim than you have for yours. I’ve provided nothing, whereas you have actively lied about the nothing you’ve brought forth. I don’t need to prove anything to you.

Not that I could, conservatives don’t think anyway, and you can’t logic someone out of a position they felt their way into.

Those are not facts. You are wrong. Nice try though.

And here lies my point. A vast majority of people don’t think its hate speech. And a vast majority of people believe free speech supersedes hate speech.

Actually, a vast majority of people don’t support being a shitbag to other people. You’re confusing popular sentiment with the whims of the conservative elite. If you don’t just hide in right wing echo chambers all the time you might be surprised to find out how unpopular your terrible views are.

Mork

Well yeah, that was the intent of the ban. They hate women.

I’m considering putting truck nuts on my fiat for exactly that reason. They’re just goofy and ridiculous!

The ability to see where the thing in the fridge I’m looking for is immediately

Or is a bread dip just concentrated soup?

Deport Tuberville.

Imagine raising more money than almost everyone will ever acquire in their lifetimes for the sole purpose of making life worse for people. Conservatives are objectively terrible people.

Stop, he can only get so erect.

Alternate shaved and not shaved so your chin is striped, trust me

(for real though, I think the beard looks good)

All I can say with certainty is it’s not me

Buddy, I’m not attacking you. I’m explaining. That’s why you’re getting pushback. Take from that what you want, but that’s how you’re coming across in my view.

Why the opposition to investigating anything at all?

The opposition is because you’re treating us as a condition to be fixed instead of who we are. You’re essentially saying, or it at least is coming off as such, that “you’re wrong, I know who you are better than you. It doesn’t matter what historically has worked to make life better for you, and it doesn’t matter what your lived experience is, I know better than you. If we can just numb the part that makes you different, I won’t have to look at people like you anymore. Wouldn’t you rather my cure?”

Pretending like people are a condition to be fixed is why you get pushback. Some people are trans, and some experience gender dysphoria. Making dysphoria less painful in some hypothetical future sense doesn’t make us not who we are. Trans men are men. Trans women are women. Telling them they’re wrong because it makes you uncomfortable isn’t going to be popular with anyone who knows or supports any trans person.

Well, I hope someday you get funding for your passion project.

I don’t think doubting the benefits of a currently fictional alternative medicine is an unreasonable position to take.