And literally nothing came of it, this whole thing is fear mongering and political theater.

What a stupid article, the URL isn’t even in it for anyone who cares alpha.lisagui.com

My iPad likes to watch TV with me, she’s constantly chiming in with little facts no one asked for.

It’s not actually eWaste you can buy a TPM chip for it, or ya know Linux.

Water-Gull. Earth-Gull. Fire-Gull. Air-Gull. Long ago, the four nations lived together in harmony. Then, everything changed when the Fire-Gull Nation attacked.

As long as you can’t hear the first one.

Probably is, they are probably sabotaging windows 10

EDIT: Fixed grammar with AI.

The word deviant doesn’t have a concrete meaning in scientific terms.

So, no—objectively speaking, gay people are not “deviant,” since morality is a human construct. (And even if it weren’t, that would be a philosophical question.)

The best way I could reframe this question is:

A. Are we evolutionarily predisposed to find people with alternative* sexual preferences distasteful or unpleasant?

B. Are alternative* sexual preferences evolutionarily harmful to society?

C. Are alternative* sexual preferences harmful to an individual’s own evolutionary success?

D. If any of the above are true, is the psychological or societal damage so detrimental—either to the individual or to society—that it would still be preferable to engage in alternative* sexual desires?

In this context, “alternative” refers to anything outside of a heterosexual relationship. However, these questions can be narrowed down to whatever specific sexual preferences you are inquiring about.

I won’t offer my own opinion on this, nor will I present any scientific evidence. But I will say this: I don’t think the issue is as black and white as some might assume.

You should always Question everything, If someone tells you not to question it, question it Harder.

If it is the Truth then it doesn’t matter if you Question it or not, and nobody should care if you question it

If it’s a Lie, then You need to know why you’re being lied to, you need to know who benefits from it, you need to know if the Lie was worth suppression of the Truth.

If your life is truly better with the Lie it is always better to know and make that decision for yourself, never let others dictate what you believe because it is better for them, If you are going to follow a Lie make sure it is in your best interest. Because anyone will tell you a lie to help themselves but no one will willingly work against their own self interest.

I would set up A shop to sell stuff, AI don’t got no money.

If that was the case then why did they make a final destination 3? Because it turned out that wasn’t the real final destination turned out the 5th destination was the final destination.

Because we can’t invent Tools either? You do know we eat coconuts and they are significantly harder to open.

3D Chess is easy, first player always wins just move your white bishop across the 3D board until the king is mated, 4D Chess is probably the same way, who can say but it is at least harder to conceptualize.

I’m sure nobody knew how cruel human tattoos would be to our survival either but look at us now…

It’s usually the pre-universal subspecies that exist between worlds we evolve into that are planting the secret essence of humanity inside us so it can grow , they genetically engineered themselves so it’s the only way they can reproduce, It grants them immortality but they must sacrifice one of there own ancestors one every hundred years or face a temporal paradox, they usually harvest a civilization every couple thousand years so they don’t have to keep coming back.

???

LOL, like the Catholic Church has anything to say on compassion

Except chemicals do literally evolve into life which evolve into DNA, it is a fuzzy point because DNA didn’t exist yet, but it is still natural selection and random chance that leads to the first life form, I am deliberately conflating biological evolution with the more main stream definition because at that point in time biology physics and chemistry were all physically conflated.

Obviously plasma beings would be nothing like us at least physically (theoretically it could have similar systems like nervous systems)

And as for life having to exist first, ehh, terms get vague at that point, are the chemicals alive? No, but when they happen to be in a certain state they are, I prefer to think of it like Rocks evolve into a planet, not the same thing as biological evolution but it’s the same word and since the chemicals are the predecessor to life then they did evolve from them in that manner just no genetics involved