I’d say only if it’s consensual.

This fails to take into account unemployment rates or any other factors that apply pressure to such decision-making. We need legislation that enshrines payment for commute time universally, as it would encourage WFH mandates rather than RTO ones. As well as compensate other workers for their commute. Or perhaps a flat rate of one hour each way’s pay no matter the distance, to stop certain workers finding it harder to get a job.

What’s wrong with Ncuti?

Wait, they’re getting rid of Ncuti? Nooo,

Current attempt? That series ended two seasons ago. The current doctor is Ncuti Gatwa, and we even had a brief spell of David Tennant again in between.

I think it’s a great idea. Their descendants can inherit any proceeds from their life, rather than the ownership of the copyright.

Copyright, even if signed away to a company, is still timed off the original creator’s lifespan.

When the most important things to zoomers, gen alpha, and still most millennials, is to prevent climate catastrophe, the thing that’s sucking down, and will suck down, most of the world’s electricity to do a few small things that you can do for yourself just as easily, all in the name of productivity and profit for the capitalist machine that is destroying the world. Well, can you see how that would drive many to just say “AI BAD!”?

You can still at least pick clean energy sources for your electricity is the point I’m making. Most don’t because it’s more expensive.

No, it’s not. Renewables are far and away cheaper. But that doesn’t change that calling it a problem on an individual level is falling for the exact propaganda corporations have been pushing since the Crying Indian commercial in 1971: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crying_Indian_public_service_announcement

I mean yeah, definitely? Corporations losing profit is much different to individual artists losing the ability to monetise their work.

One fundamental part of “intelligence” is being able to come up with independent thoughts. Another is to be able to think critically about those thoughts. LLMs cannot do either.

I’m perfectly happy to call it theft. At that point it’s not like piracy, you’re stealing the essence of the work and shoving in your uncanny valley machine.

It’s not really about feelings? It’s provably, demonstrably wrong a bunch of the time. It’s pathologically incapable of saying “I don’t know this”. Also you’re nitpicking, they may have conflated LLMs with AI but so is the article and you clearly knew what OC was talking about.

Did you ask ChatGPT for these figures? Would explain why you’re using nonsensical units.

Photoshop are literally stealing their customers images to train their AIs: https://mashable.com/article/adobe-users-outaged-new-policy-trains-ai-their-work

Oh yes of course, it’s the people’s fault because they dismiss discussion of petrochemicals. Not the billion-dollar companies lobbying.

Actually, it seems like the grumpy old men are the ones zealously advocating for AI, and most of the people complaining are younger and take issue with the labour and artists rights, as well as environmental, problems that it causes.

I feel like they lost prestige more broadly but I’m obviously bias being here on Lemmy. We see I guess, I predict them tanking after their IPO.

That doesn’t mean I think they should get to keep that stuff. Sure, we lost a lot of knowledge there, and that sucks. But the company lost out and pushed their IPO way back for it and I enjoy seeing Spez suffer after what he did to Aaron’s legacy.

Good! The users add all the value to that site, moderate if for free and they couldn’t even not be cunts about it.