So if you think you can win without trying to court their votes, why the vitriol?
Also: https://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/election_scorecard/2007/10/sour_grapes.html 20% of Clinton supporters ended up voting for McCain, the number for Sanders voters is 10%. Sanders did everything to make sure Clinton won, and he still got blamed for her terrible campaign losing.
Why can’t she reach far to the left to get their support instead? If potential Jill Stein voters can lose her the election, she could see what those people care about and reach out to them?
They would’ve probably been fine with a stop on sending offensive weapons while keeping iron dome stocked or something like that.
Instead they’re trying to find the mythical voter that gives a shit about what Dick Cheney thinks.
Harris has her own share of problematic endorsements (Cheney, Gonzalez,…). Sure, they’re not explicitly racist, ‘just’ war criminals, but she accepted them and is actually bragging about getting them.
Yeah, I was making a rhetorical point to contrast to how a certain someone treated an endorsement by a war criminal.
Stein’s campaign says it wants nothing to do with Duke, the former American Nazi Party member.
It’s one thing to be endorsed by an undesirable party, it’s another to accept it or even invite them to campaign with you.
Depends on how she reacts to it. If she takes him campaigning, it’s definitely bad. If she rejects the endorsement it’s something different.
Or intentionally ran one over with a bulldozer, or shot them in the head while wearing a press flak jacket?
Musk can send him to Mars for safekeeping.
Yeah, they look nothing alike side by side.
Now that’s a headline you wouldn’t see on the BBC.
Yep, they need to stop trotting out these people.
Other distros were faster with updating packages, or for Ubuntu specifically you had PPAs or repositories maintained by the vendor.
I think that’s mostly solved, but yeah, some of the sandbox stuff affected performance.
The issues are twofold: Linux distros historically update software through a package manager. Something that was working fine for everyone, however it was causing a lot of work for maintainers. They got together and designed a packaging format for software that works across all Linux distributions called ‘flatpak’. However, Ubuntu decided to create an alternative called Snap, which solves the same problem, except it’s not used by anyone else.
Also, there’s some implementation details that make it look messy in your system (every application is mounted as it’s own filesystem, so if you use tools to list your disk’s there’s a bunch of weird spammy looking drives and things like that).
There’s plenty of dead Americans already on both sides of this conflict. But somehow the brown ones don’t get mentioned.
Probably still would get issues with hard water though. OP needs a softener.
As if that would do any good. Democrats need to stop trotting out Republicans.
But escalating with Iran is fine I guess?